The Dems that voted against expulsion claimed that they didn't want to set a precedent of a lawmaker being expelled without a conviction or an ethics committee report.Well yes obviously, I was just wondering if there was some reason beyond cynical broken politics. What's the windows dressing?
No, no... the 1st image should be "That just means we can leave it to the states to decide!"
I'm not sure if we can quantify that last one (the success part, not the age), but the rest of this checks out. Thankfully.Regarding Trump "being ahead" of Biden in the polls right now
The best polling firms account for this. They are very sophisticated in considering these very problems. But that is not all polling firms. So WHICH polling firm is in the news is important to consider but maybe that is too nuanced for most people.Really, the poll should have been "Trump Polls higher among people who answer unknown callers or respond to polls"
IE nobody under 40
Skeptical is fine but the good polling firms really do know what they are doing. If you know which which which, that is better than blanket skepticism.I would be highly skeptical of any polling at this stage. Right now the pundits are saying "Yeah, take it seriously and work to improve it, but also don't panic needlessly"
Right, but it's also too early to get an accurate read on how people are going to vote in a year. There's a whole lot of crazy that can happen in that time, not even considering one of the candidates may not wake up after going to sleep.The best polling firms account for this. They are very sophisticated in considering these very problems. But that is not all polling firms. So WHICH polling firm is in the news is important to consider but maybe that is too nuanced for most people.
Post automatically merged:
Skeptical is fine but the good polling firms really do know what they are doing. If you know which which which, that is better than blanket skepticism.
Is it wrong if I hope for that? I’ll let you figure out which one.… considering one of the candidates may not wake up after going to sleep.
No argument from me there.Right, but it's also too early to get an accurate read on how people are going to vote in a year. There's a whole lot of crazy that can happen in that time, not even considering one of the candidates may not wake up after going to sleep.
*insert "why not both" gif here*Is it wrong if I hope for that? I’ll let you figure out which one.
Except last night ended up almost perfectly in line with the polls.Regarding Trump "being ahead" of Biden in the polls right now
Frequently that vote came begrudingly, though, and only after special favors and compromises had been cut out specifically for Manchin's gain.Manchin sucks, but he did vote with Biden 88% of the time.
Here's hoping.Well, I guess I shouldn't assume too much. Maybe someone more progressive will have a better chance than Manchin.
Nor are we likely to see north Korea elect a better president than Kim Yung Un, or Israel become a peaceful neighborly country. Doesn't mean we can't hope for it - or for at least it to be more clear and obvious.Nobody on this forum will ever see West Virginia elect a better senator than Manchin.