Ah yes, they've mistakenly did things that made them more money, no matter who got hurt. Just a little snafu.
Don't worry, this is just the free market at work... eventually, once the customers make their objections more and more murderous, the companies will have no choice but to improve the product.
*sigh* That's not what I meant. Forget it. I won't discuss this any further.
An aggressive, snarky tone has obviously not landed the way you hoped. Like I tell my kids, know your audience and know when the bit is over.
Sure is. So is the ignore button so I don't see your posts anymore. Toodles.
Ok, so what was the bit in your opinion ?
I know you won't be seeing this, but i wasn't trying to insult you, i just found it funny how effective late stage capitalism propaganda is in framing the issue of putting profit over lives as simply a mistake by companies...
When your joke doesn't land, maybe lead with the apology instead of doubling down until the person you're
"I'm going to respond to what you said even though I know you meant something else."
Ha ha. Hilarious. But maybe working on your own PR.
His 1st response was that he wouldn't discuss it further, so i assumed he already was writing me off completely.
"Hey, seems I came across more abrasive than I meant to, I'm sorry."
Yes, because i saw the contradiction between those 2 things as relevant.
Where in what i posted did i imply that PR is a good thing ?
Problem is, it's not like i'll stop being sarcastic most of the time.
Hey man, if saying sorry is literally impossible for you, that's fine. But people take snark better when they see examples of you showing you don't actually mean to hurt them.
Funny enough, my ignore list on here isn't terribly long. It takes a lot to push me to that point. The only others on my lists are Charlie and Jay. ElJuski would have gone on it if the option was available back in the day. but I don't believe it was.
The thing is, can you really say snark isn't meant to hurt at least a bit ?
bsky.app
www.cbsnews.com
Yeah, when I read there was a major manhunt for him I laughed. Of course. Gotta appease the billionaires by spending millions failing to catch someone because, and here's a shocker, cops are terrible at solving crimes. Fucking awful.
Why are you skeptical? I don't see a reason to believe or doubt currently.
I find it hard to believe that a guy who planned this out as well as he did didn't ditch the weapon and was carrying a manifesto.
Well, I think that "planned well" might be giving him more credit than is due, simply because the NYPD might just not be such a crack team of investigators sweeping the city for a genius assassin. Until we learn more, I can't accept "he was brilliant before and now he's an idiot?" As good enough evidence of anything, because before he might just have been slightly ahead of the NYPD and nothing more.
Depends on his mindset. Also would be hard to ditch the “ghost gun” as its entire point is that it’s never been fired before and there is no record of its barrel signature. If he’s still on the run he just may have never found a good place to rid himself of it where it couldn’t possibly be recovered.
