GasBandit said:
Iaculus said:
Ooh, nice incoherent rant. I especially like the way he uses 'Muslim' as an invective.
He does that because the mainstream media apparently is allergic using the word. Remember in the paris riots when it was "ethnic youths" reported in every media source, and nobody wanted identify the one thing they all had in common?
You mean apart from (in this case) coming from a certain part of the Middle East, rebelling/fighting (hard to delineate with Gaza) against Israel, and being governed/ordered around by a certain former terrorist group that hasn't even bothered to bleach its underpants? Let's go for a descriptor that wouldn't apply to 1.5
billion people here, eh? Honestly, what does it add to affix 'Muslim' there? Is 'Hamas goons' not good enough? Not precise enough? I assume that he always refers to 'those Christian Republicans' and 'those godless Democrats' as well?
Look, I always saw major areas of conflict as the result of sociopolitical factors. Religion is an exacerbator, yes, but not nearly to the extent that militant atheists or adherents to
other faiths might assume, and it is
never the primary reason for a conflict. Nope, not even that one.
[/rant]
Oh, and just to indulge my inner pedant - espy, Islam is a
religion. What does racism have to do with anything? Now, if I'd been complaining about him referring to them as Arabs, yeah, I can see that, but Muslims? How is that racist?