Gas Bandit's Political Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
GasBandit said:
Barack Obama's choice for energy secretary - Steven Chu ... he was a tree sitter in Berkeley, an archdeacon of the church of Global Warming. Lovely.
Yup, that succinctly sums his important attributes. The fact that he's a National Academy of Sciences member and director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is inconsequential. Or that he won one of those medals the Swedes give out to just anybody.
 
Jake said:
Yup, that succinctly sums his important attributes. The fact that he's a National Academy of Sciences member and director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is inconsequential. Or that he won one of those medals the Swedes give out to just anybody.
You forget that, as far as GasBandit is concerned, Science is Eviland Corrupt. Any scientist supporting global warming is, de facto, bought and making up figures to support their claim and not neutral or fair in any way.
Of course, this has the handy side effect of making all science that could prove a countrpoint invalid, leaving only science that supports his cause. It's very nice and utterly self-defeating.
 
I

Iaculus

Sorry for the delay - busy day again.

GasBandit said:
The first quote in there was from the John D. Rockefeller General Education Board, which pretty much created the modern "public school" paradigm (at least in the northeast and parts of the south). The others were more colorful decoration, certainly. American public schools were designed and created with social placidity in mind, not education. John Taylor Gatto has written some very informative books on the subject, and even put up a little taste online. Ironically, the people who created the system were probably as far from "liberal" as one could get (even the American definition) at the time... but since then control of the school system has changed to those.
Looked that thing up - consensus seems to be that the book's compelling but poorly-sourced (for instance, its assertion of a 93% literacy rate mid-nineteenth century was only accurate for adult white males). I'd treat it with caution. Also, your more relevant assertion of a 'liberal takeover' - mind going into that further?

For the purposes of most political debate, especially pertaining to American politics, it is the only definition that is relevant regardless of how "new" and "american" it is. It is the terminology that is being used. Much like it doesn't matter how much you still want "gay" to mean "joyful," or how there's really no difference between a "furry" and a "fursuiter" in the public mind, this is what the terms have come to mean when they are used.
Your analogy of 'gay' as 'happy' is invalid. Liberalism worldwide averages out as being closer to its classic, European definition - a centrist ideology promoting individual freedom (consider the ideologies of organisations such as Liberal International and its affiliates) - and liberalism as a pejorative indicating big-government oppression and the erosion of the individual largely occurs only within the heads of rabid right-wingers such as Ann Coulter. It's like saying that 'gay' means 'marshmallow' because that's how it's used in China (not a perfect analogy, I'll admit).

Within the United States, liberalism is no ideological monolith either. Though social liberalism is currently ascendant, equating all liberals (be they neoliberals, conservative liberals, paleoliberals, ordoliberals, or whatever) with them is just as daft as asserting that all conservatives are either neocons or members of the Religious Right. I note that you have often railed against those you deem not to be 'real' conservatives, who are currently ascendant on that side of the fence - would you therefore assert that those who occupy a rapidly-thinning majority are relevant for discussion of a very broad ideology?

That's a very admirable and very inapplicable sentiment in this situation. It isn't the scientists who set policy, it's politicians goaded to action by panicked constituents. We've seen multiple times on multiple issues (the economy, global warming, foreign policy) that how decisions are made that affect the people, the world, and the future is packaging and image. No, it's not the ideal system, but it's the reality of how our lives are being decided this very moment, even as we speak. The great swayers of public opinion aren't scientists and economists, they're comedians and actors. More people trust to John Stewart to form their opinions for them than a less pretty, less funny expert in any given field. Everything has to be sold like a product, and you don't always get to choose the site or method of the battles you fight. And the stakes are high. Heck, in the global warming debate, we're practically being told we have to choose between complete economic devastation and outright annihilation by natural disaster. I wonder if Ghandi might have not been less adverse to eyepoking if the Britons were gunning down every Indian they could find on sight.
Then you have no right to complain about the activities of either side in that debate.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Iaculus said:
Sorry for the delay - busy day again.

Looked that thing up - consensus seems to be that the book's compelling but poorly-sourced (for instance, its assertion of a 93% literacy rate mid-nineteenth century was only accurate for adult white males). I'd treat it with caution. Also, your more relevant assertion of a 'liberal takeover' - mind going into that further?
It is so well established as to be bordering on trite that academic institutions are overwhelmingly populated by those whose political proclivities tend toward the liberal. Suggested explanations for this come from every angle and are all over the map, ranging from "conservatives just aren't very interested in concepts that don't have a direct financial appliance" to "the shelter of academia protects fragile liberal ideas from being shattered by the reality of the world" to some ideas in between. What is never in doubt from any source, however, is that academia is comprised of many more liberally minded faculty and staff than conservative. As for K-12, the educational system is caught in the maw of the NEA and the AFT, which as you might guess (being unions), are not particularly conservative in nature.

Your analogy of 'gay' as 'happy' is invalid. Liberalism worldwide averages out as being closer to its classic, European definition - a centrist ideology promoting individual freedom (consider the ideologies of organisations such as Liberal International and its affiliates) - and liberalism as a pejorative indicating big-government oppression and the erosion of the individual largely occurs only within the heads of rabid right-wingers such as Ann Coulter. It's like saying that 'gay' means 'marshmallow' because that's how it's used in China (not a perfect analogy, I'll admit).
Actually, "liberal" being a dirty word is more the work of Limbaugh than Coulter.. Coulter's strictly coattails material. It is not, however, "all in their heads." One of the US's most visible liberals, Teddy Kennedy, upon the victory of the Patriots in the 2002 super bowl, said "At a time when our entire country is banding together and facing down individualism, the Patriots set a wonderful example, showing us all what is possible when we work together, believe in each other, and sacrifice for the greater good."

Within the United States, liberalism is no ideological monolith either. Though social liberalism is currently ascendant, equating all liberals (be they neoliberals, conservative liberals, paleoliberals, ordoliberals, or whatever) with them is just as daft as asserting that all conservatives are either neocons or members of the Religious Right. I note that you have often railed against those you deem not to be 'real' conservatives, who are currently ascendant on that side of the fence - would you therefore assert that those who occupy a rapidly-thinning majority are relevant for discussion of a very broad ideology?
Look, I applaud you trying to "take back" the terminology for sake of correctness, but the fact of the matter is if you want to take part in a discussion/debate of this magnitude already well underway you have to use the terminology as it is established. This is what has been largely defined by the applicable players involved as conservative and liberal. Yes, by that definition canada and the vast majority of europe are waaay liberal. But you know what? They are.


Then you have no right to complain about the activities of either side in that debate.
That's silly. Of course I do. Because they're claiming their decisions come about from untainted science and the best of intentions, when in fact it comes mostly from junk science, tainted or selectively picked data, and from an ulterior desire to harm capitalist industry.




Oh, and for all the people saying
Several Boneheads said:
Gas Bandit says science is evil! Hur hur hur.
I never did. And in fact, for quite a while now, science has actually had very little to do with the global warming debate.
 
J

JCM

Jake said:
GasBandit said:
Barack Obama's choice for energy secretary - Steven Chu ... he was a tree sitter in Berkeley, an archdeacon of the church of Global Warming. Lovely.
Yup, that succinctly sums his important attributes. The fact that he's a National Academy of Sciences member and director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is inconsequential. Or that he won one of those medals the Swedes give out to just anybody.
ZING!
 
Bubble181 said:
Jake said:
Yup, that succinctly sums his important attributes. The fact that he's a National Academy of Sciences member and director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is inconsequential. Or that he won one of those medals the Swedes give out to just anybody.
You forget that, as far as GasBandit is concerned, Science is Eviland Corrupt. Any scientist supporting global warming is, de facto, bought and making up figures to support their claim and not neutral or fair in any way.
Of course, this has the handy side effect of making all science that could prove a countrpoint invalid, leaving only science that supports his cause. It's very nice and utterly self-defeating.
Not to mention, his tree-hugginess mostly turns into his stance that the government needs to apply the DARPA model to energy research, which is fine by me. Let private industry handle energy-efficiency, where they can conceivably make a return off of it, and use a DARPA-clone to fund alternate energy projects with a low chance of success but high chance of learning how to succeed next time.
 
A

Armadillo

Krisken said:
Exclusive: Norm Coleman's Renovation Project Coincides with Financial Lawsuit

I feel a little bad for Minnesota. This Senatorial election for them was pretty much lose/lose.
No doubt. That's why I voted for Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley. You may remember him from such Senate appointments as when Paul Wellstone died.

On a more serious note, the DFL (Democratic Farmer-Labor party for the non-hotdish eaters out there) really shot themselves in the foot by choosing Al Franken as their candidate. There were a couple of good, serious Democrats out there that would have mopped the fucking floor with Norm, but NOOOOOOO...we just can't resist a good ol' celebrity politician up here. :roll:
 
Armadillo said:
Krisken said:
Exclusive: Norm Coleman's Renovation Project Coincides with Financial Lawsuit

I feel a little bad for Minnesota. This Senatorial election for them was pretty much lose/lose.
No doubt. That's why I voted for Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley. You may remember him from such Senate appointments as when Paul Wellstone died.

On a more serious note, the DFL (Democratic Farmer-Labor party for the non-hotdish eaters out there) really shot themselves in the foot by choosing Al Franken as their candidate. There were a couple of good, serious Democrats out there that would have mopped the fucking floor with Norm, but NOOOOOOO...we just can't resist a good ol' celebrity politician up here. :roll:
Tell me about it.
I like a bit of Barkley's stances, I wish he had gotten more attention during the "NORM & AL" show.
Still, for a little third party guy he did pretty damn good.
I think us Minnesotans can be proud of that at least.
Maybe next time.
 
Espy said:
Armadillo said:
Krisken said:
Exclusive: Norm Coleman's Renovation Project Coincides with Financial Lawsuit

I feel a little bad for Minnesota. This Senatorial election for them was pretty much lose/lose.
No doubt. That's why I voted for Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley. You may remember him from such Senate appointments as when Paul Wellstone died.

On a more serious note, the DFL (Democratic Farmer-Labor party for the non-hotdish eaters out there) really shot themselves in the foot by choosing Al Franken as their candidate. There were a couple of good, serious Democrats out there that would have mopped the fucking floor with Norm, but NOOOOOOO...we just can't resist a good ol' celebrity politician up here. :roll:
Tell me about it.
I like a bit of Barkley's stances, I wish he had gotten more attention during the "NORM & AL" show.
Still, for a little third party guy he did pretty damn good.
I think us Minnesotans can be proud of that at least.
Maybe next time.
We even had the highest voter turnout in the nation this year. We had 77.8% of registered voters show up, the national average was 61.6.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Most mainstream media sources are doing pretty good at tiptoeing around the fact that Bernie Madoff, orchestrator of what is being called the world's largest Ponzi scheme ever (to the tune of fifty billion dollars) was a big donor to democrat party concerns and candidates. You can bet if he was a GOP donor, it'd have been trumpeted at every opportunity. If he was a libertarian party candidate the money would have been considered twice as squandered as before :p

But really, about all this ponzi scheme stuff... a ponzi scheme is a system destined to collapse which pays off dividends to early contributors with the buy-in money of later contributors and the cycle repeats until it becomes unsustainably large and insufficient new suckers can be found to keep the trickle going to the previous generation of suckers.... What Madoff is really guilty of here is just impersonating the federal government. When Madoff does it they call it a "ponzi scheme" and throw the perp in the slammer. When the federal government does it they call it Social Security and keep the perp in office for 4 terms.

Perhaps the Korean immigrant whose family was killed when an F-18 crashed into his house doesn't blame the pilot, but his neighbors sure want to blame the marine air base. They want that thing closed and outta there. Somehow I find it hard to agree with them when the base has been around longer than any of the complainers has been alive (1917), and THEY chose to move close to IT.

Due to computer glitches and government bureaucracy, widows of our war veterans have been wrongfully denied millions of dollars in government benefits. This is why we don't want the federal government in charge of more stuff.

How do you feel about the government spending your taxpayer dollars to help delinquent mortgage borrowers?

Teachers unions are hindering student learning? There's a real shocker.



It's official .. a court in Germany has ruled that having epic boobies is not an illness.
 
I am happy that Biden picked a real dog, to fulfill his wife's promise to buy him a dog if he got elected VEEP. He picked out a German Shepherd Dog....!

 
You missed this piece of kind and tender tolerance to those who have different opinions than yours: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/12/13/palin.church/?iref=hpmostpop
So don't like the previous veep candidate? What better way to show your tolerance than to torch her church and create over a million dollars in damage and endanger the lives of those inside?
Central Mat-Su Fire Department Chief James Steele said the department was "treating it as suspicious and as potential arson at this point" but did not elaborate, The Anchorage Daily News reported.

The newspaper said Palin released a statement after the fire in which she said she stopped by the church Saturday morning and offered an apology to the assistant pastor "if the incident is in any way connected to the undeserved negative attention the church has received since she became a vice presidential candidate."
Seriously though, hopefully this wasn't the case but... it's hard to believe it was for any other reason.
I hope they find the scum who did this.
 
A

Armadillo

Espy said:
Huh. How many Minnesotans do we have on this board?
Didn't you get the message? We're taking over the world one message board at a time. Lutefisk for all!!!

(Note: I am not Scandinavian and do not endorse lutefisk or its usage as a torture device. I'm German, where at least the damn food's better. We also have beer, you Nordic twits.)
 
Armadillo said:
Espy said:
Huh. How many Minnesotans do we have on this board?
Didn't you get the message? We're taking over the world one message board at a time. Lutefisk for all!!!

(Note: I am not Scandinavian and do not endorse lutefisk or its usage as a torture device. I'm German, where at least the damn food's better. We also have beer, you Nordic twits.)
Not like we have anything better to do. It's too damn cold to go anywhere.
 
A

Armadillo

slothilopolis said:
Armadillo said:
Espy said:
Huh. How many Minnesotans do we have on this board?
Didn't you get the message? We're taking over the world one message board at a time. Lutefisk for all!!!

(Note: I am not Scandinavian and do not endorse lutefisk or its usage as a torture device. I'm German, where at least the damn food's better. We also have beer, you Nordic twits.)
Not like we have anything better to do. It's too damn cold to go anywhere.
I watch a lot of hockey. That's something.
 
Armadillo said:
slothilopolis said:
Armadillo said:
Espy said:
Huh. How many Minnesotans do we have on this board?
Didn't you get the message? We're taking over the world one message board at a time. Lutefisk for all!!!

(Note: I am not Scandinavian and do not endorse lutefisk or its usage as a torture device. I'm German, where at least the damn food's better. We also have beer, you Nordic twits.)
Not like we have anything better to do. It's too damn cold to go anywhere.
I watch a lot of hockey. That's something.
It's better than being out in the -21 below windchill I had to walk though going Christmas shopping tonight.
And I am NOT Scandinavian either.
And I also do not watch hockey.
I do drink beer though.
 
My toes are still cold from the drive to work this morning.

With this many Minnesota residents, I think we need a frozen emoticon...like this one but smaller:
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Bush is discussing an auto "rescue" that could cost upwards of $40 billion. Well, at least the man is consistent, I guess. :eek:rly:

And while we're on the subject, how about a recap of the worst government waste of the year.

A shout out to all our Minnesotans in the thread. Norm Coleman has asked the Minnesota Supreme Court to get involved in this Senate race with funny guy Al Franken.

I guess even in these troubled economic times, every cloud has a silver lining: Some Mexicans leaving US, planning never to return.

This story is about a supermarket that refused to personalize a birthday cake for a toddler .. Adolf Hitler Campbell. Parents of the year.

Here's a twofer from the UK ... environmentalist protesters and government waste.

What is going on in Great Britain lately? Now the Salvation Army can't ring bells or shake charity tins because it might "offend other religions." (Yes, I realize it's the daily mail :finger: )

Haven't had enough from the UK? Fine. A blind man was turned away from a restaurant because his guide dog was offensive to the Muslim staff. (The restaraunt was apparently one of Indian cuisine)
 

JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell and Adolf Hitler Campbell?

Are you fucking kidding me? You are looking at the next generation of racist idiots, folks. I mean really. It's okay to be racist - it's your right as a US citizen. But these poor kids are going to be persecuted throughout the rest of their lives.

I would LOVE to see the kid date a black DUDE when he turns 16. Just to fuck with the moronic parents.
 
Edrondol said:
JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell and Adolf Hitler Campbell?

Are you fucking kidding me? You are looking at the next generation of racist idiots, folks. I mean really. It's okay to be racist - it's your right as a US citizen. But these poor kids are going to be persecuted throughout the rest of their lives.

I would LOVE to see the kid date a black DUDE when he turns 16. Just to fuck with the moronic parents.
You're thinking small, ed. Think bigger.

Think of the kid dating one of dem Jews.

But yeah, its kinda nasty of the store to refuse to do the cake for the kid. I mean. He's a kid.

What is going on in Great Britain lately? Now the Salvation Army can't ring bells or shake charity tins because it might "offend other religions." (Yes, I realize it's the daily mail :finger: )

Haven't had enough from the UK? Fine. A blind man was turned away from a restaurant because his guide dog was offensive to the Muslim staff. (The restaraunt was apparently one of Indian cuisine
Facepalm. Its the Salvation Army. You know? They do charity?

Yes. Muslims do think of dogs as unclean. But they could've placed the dog somewhere for the blind man rather than call security.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Futureking said:
Edrondol said:
JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell and Adolf Hitler Campbell?

Are you fucking kidding me? You are looking at the next generation of racist idiots, folks. I mean really. It's okay to be racist - it's your right as a US citizen. But these poor kids are going to be persecuted throughout the rest of their lives.

I would LOVE to see the kid date a black DUDE when he turns 16. Just to fuck with the moronic parents.
You're thinking small, ed. Think bigger.

Think of the kid dating one of dem Jews.

But yeah, its kinda nasty of the store to refuse to do the cake for the kid. I mean. He's a kid.
Future son in law-
 
Oy gas, you brought some facepalmers today.
I dunno about the dog one though... private business right? He wants to deny the guy it's on his head and now everyone knows he's a f-ing discriminating moron.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Espy said:
Oy gas, you brought some facepalmers today.
I dunno about the dog one though... private business right? He wants to deny the guy it's on his head and now everyone knows he's a f-ing discriminating moron.
They apparently have something over there that is analogous to our "americans with disabilities act" which makes it illegal for them to do so.
 
GasBandit said:
Espy said:
Oy gas, you brought some facepalmers today.
I dunno about the dog one though... private business right? He wants to deny the guy it's on his head and now everyone knows he's a f-ing discriminating moron.
They apparently have something over there that is analogous to our "americans with disabilities act" which makes it illegal for them to do so.
Gotcha. Don't get me wrong, it's not GOOD that this guy did this, but it's GOOD to shine a light on this kind of discrimination.

Also: Sounds like the Palin Church arson fire is heating up: http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/national_world&id=6557103
An accelerant was poured around the exterior of Gov. Sarah Palin's church before fire heavily damaged the building, federal investigators said Monday.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said the accelerant was poured at several locations around the church, including entrances.

Lab tests will determine the type of substance involved. Possibilities include gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel or even lamp oil, Agent Nick Starcevic said.
 

ElJuski

Staff member
Yup, that's great guys. Burning down her church, that's how you get what you want. Hate and ignorance always wins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top