Trans women are the most likely to be assaulted by men in private settings like this. It's as simple as that.I still don't understand why people are so hung up on this.
And I mean both sides, to be clear.
Trans women are the most likely to be assaulted by men in private settings like this. It's as simple as that.I still don't understand why people are so hung up on this.
And I mean both sides, to be clear.
The problems are the point. This is a minority community to "other" and blame. It's by design.I still don't understand why people are so hung up on this.
And I mean both sides, to be clear. There are a billion good ways of skirting this issue without problems.
Be applied unequally, of course. Just like rich white republicans can get abortions, rape minors, and do all the things they demonize in poor and minority people.I also sincerely wonder what that law would do...
*loud incorrect buzzer sound*I still don't understand why people are so hung up on this.
And I mean both sides, to be clear. There are a billion good ways of skirting this issue without problems.
So every business should just build more bathrooms? Making all existing bathrooms gender neutral is better but you think the bigots will be cool with that?What I don't get is why they don't strive/push more towards other solutions than "I want to keep bathrooms clearly segregated into men and women, and then never want to encounter any bigot who thinks I don't belong there". Because, well, that's not going to happen in this
This law does make exception for minors under the age of 12 if accompanied by a parent/guardian of the so-called correct sex of the bathroom (also cops can ignore this law because of fucking course they can). Although there are people 12 and over who have mental or physical disabilities such that they also need assistance who cant get it under this law.I also sincerely wonder what that law would do to fathers and their daughters (or mothers and sons) going to either bathroom to assist (in the "I can go to the potty but need help wiping/putting on my pants/washing my hands" age category).
This makes it sound broad enough that, for example, any man could be sued for being in a building that houses any women's bathroom, simply because he MIGHT use the women's bathroom. So if, for instance, a business decides to designate all of its bathrooms as "for women," a man could be sued under this law the instant he walks in the door.it also lets people sue someone who "intends to engage in such conduct.". So trans people not only can't enter the bathroom they also presumably can't even enter the building the bathroom is in without putting themselves at risk of being sued.
It's not the intended use (at least against cis men) but technically yeah. Similar to when Utah allowed parents to sue to get "pornographic" (meaning acknowledging the existence of LGBTI+ people) books banned from schools, only to get pissy when people pointed out that the Bible met their definition & sued to get that banned. Bad laws are often badly written.This makes it sound broad enough that, for example, any man could be sued for being in a building that houses any women's bathroom, simply because he MIGHT use the women's bathroom. So if, for instance, a business decides to designate all of its bathrooms as "for women," a man could be sued under this law the instant he walks in the door.
--Patrick
Because if you can’t piss or shit outside of your own home then you can’t exist in public. Which is why bigots want to restrict access and non bigots have a problem with it.I still don't understand why people are so hung up on this.
There are but bigots fundamentally don’t want trans people to exist. It’s not about people’s safety it’s about wiping out trans people,And I mean both sides, to be clear. There are a billion good ways of skirting this issue without problems.
Because the trans community is very small relative to the entire population, meaning they can't push anything without having their wants/needs diluted by the sheer volume of non-trans people.why [isn't] the trans community pushing more for a bathroom situation that is open/inclusive to all, rather than trying to force it into "men and women's bathrooms and we can go into which one we identify as".
I think it’s also partly that at this point most Americans don’t know any trans people, making it easier to paint them as disgusting perverts or whatnot, the way they used to with gay people.Because the trans community is very small relative to the entire population, meaning they can't push anything without having their wants/needs diluted by the sheer volume of non-trans people.
--Patrick
I would counter that, at this point, the odds suggest most (i.e., > 50%) Americans probably DO know at least one trans person, with the ones saying "I don't know any trannies!" merely unaware that at least one of the people they know is someone who is trans and hiding it, or else trans and "passing" (either post-HRT or just through sheer force of personality).at this point most Americans don’t know any trans people
Also I fully trust the American rightwinger to be able to say “Yeah Susan is trans but she’s not like those perverts who just want to dominate women’s sports. In fact one time I brought it up and Susan agreed with me about how to deal with “trans” people.” And not have a single follow up thought.I would counter that, at this point, the odds suggest most (i.e., > 50%) Americans probably DO know at least one trans person, with the ones saying "I don't know any trannies!" merely unaware that at least one of the people they know is someone who is trans and hiding it, or else trans and "passing" (either post-HRT or just through sheer force of personality).
When I say "The trans community is small," I am mainly referring to the ones who are "out" and vocal about it, but I'd be willing to bet there are plenty of other "undocumented" trans folks who just want to live out their life as-is, without making any big deal about it.
--Patrick
I know you don't mean it this way, but I want to point out that not telling someone they're trans is not 'hiding it' just like you not constantly telling people you're cis isn't hiding it. It's none of their business and a trans person isn't obligated to tell anyone.merely unaware that at least one of the people they know is someone who is trans and hiding it, or else trans and "passing"
Shortly after the moment my eyes and mind were fully opened to the idea of LGBTQ+ being An Actual Thing, I thought back to people I knew in my pre-college schooling. For instance, how these four girls always seemed to hang out together, even outside of school. And especially how one kid really decided to go all out for Hallowe'en or "opposite sex day" or whatever it was, where he not only did hair and makeup, but even included a couple of tennis balls to give himself a pair of breasts that were proportionate, yet not exaggerated. He caught an embarrassing amount of shit for doing so, but that's when I started thinking maybe there was a little more to it than just school spirit, and wondered whether he'd ever found happiness.I suspect that plenty of trans and queer people leave the communities where they spawned and are never talked about again there.
How does the saying go? That the terribly unfortunate side effects are the whole reason in the first place? Something like that.Lots of people will face harassment because of these laws.
Yeah, really seems to be the focus. Someone in the GOP really, really wants to be Secretary of Genital Inspections.Has anyone mentioned that these anti-trans bills are also an attack on anyone who doesn't follow societal norms? This is an attack on women who are too tall, who don't wear makeup, who don't dress feminine enough, who don't wax/shave their facial hair, who are BIPOC and don't meet white standards of femininity, who are too athletic, or who don't go to enough effort to make themselves look stereotypically feminine. It's also an attack on men who are too short, dress too colorfully, have gynocomastia, or otherwise fail to make themselves look manly enough.
Lots of people will face harassment because of these laws.
Righini remained in his house for hours as troopers tried to convince him to come outside. In the meanwhile, Righini made several social media posts including a video claiming, “Now they’re trying to arrest me simply because I do not believe in gay rights and abortion.”
“I assure you that I am not the aggressor here,” he continued. “They tried to arrest me, they tried to taze me, they are trying to make me a criminal… I’m sorry this had to happen, I really am. But I’m backed into a corner with my political beliefs.”
He then said that he hadn’t been able to find a job in over a year and had struggled “his entire life… fighting Democrats and trying to stand up for my beliefs.” “Let me ask you: If you’re a law enforcement officer, why do you support the COVID vaccines? Why do you support abortion? Why do you support what isn’t morally right? How are you fighting for a state system that protects illegal immigrants and pedophiles? Please explain this to me.” He then asked why it’s legal to “murder” babies in his state “up until the moment of conception.”
My dude, your beliefs weren't the issue, other than your belief that you thought it was ok to physically kick a woman out of the house and hold your child hostage. Also you needed a better understanding of biology.Righini then tried to escape in a car, but officers disabled his vehicle. While fleeing on foot, he shot and killed a 4-year-old trooper dog named Preacher. Righini then began firing at officers who shot and killed him.
You know what deprives women of "dignity, safety, well-being"? Fucking incels. I have exactly zero things that concern me regarding the existence of trans people. As far as sharing a public restroom with trans women, the only danger is some cunt harassing/attacking the trans women. On the other hand, there are many instances of incels murdering random women in public spaces. If you really want to "protect women" deal with the incels, pussy grabbers, and Andrew Tate disciples--I recommend neutering and shock collars.Anti-Trans Headers Placed On Websites Judge Ordered Trump To Restore
"After a federal judge ruled that the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control, and the Health and Human Services departments must reinstate web pages containing vital information about trans people and other marginalized groups, the Trump Administration capitulated — however, officials added a highly misleading disclaimer to them."
There were more anti-trans bills before the house:"The Crime Is Being Trans": Montana House Passes Indecent Exposure Bill Applying Only To Trans People
"On Friday, the Montana House of Representatives passed an indecent exposure bill, HB446, that effectively creates two separate legal standards—one for transgender people and one for everyone else. Under current law, indecent exposure requires intent, such as deliberately streaking across a field or flashing bystanders. However, this bill removes the requirement of intent when applied to transgender individuals, making it possible to criminalize them simply for existing in certain public spaces."