Movie News & Miscellany

I wasn't sure where to put this, so I'm putting it here:

Rooster Teeth Is Shutting Down After 21 Years

Warner Bros Discovery is looking to sell off the various IP (Red vs Blue, RWBY, and Gen:Lock series, as well as the Rooster Teeth podcast).

There will be a final, 19th, season of Red vs Blue with a feature length film. (I had no idea RvB was still going.)
I'm sorry to see them go, but it's probably for the best. The studio's been plagued with problems for so long now.

Hope RWBY gets finished though.
 
1712713985883.jpeg


You opened this floodgate you Snydercut dipshits. Gonna be hearing him bitch and moan for a chance to fix movies forever. Makes Lucas seem restrained.
 
I remember watching Sucker Punch but I don't remember a single thing about that movie. Somehow a film about four (was it four?) hot girls in a variety of fantastic scenarios while showing ludicrous amounts of skin and performing a wide range of action scenes managed to not leave any sort of impression on me.

Me.

If that's not a sign of a failed movie, I don't know what is.

So g'on, Zack Snyder, recut your movie. Let's see if you can make it a more memorable one.
 
We used to joke with Li'l Z , who shares a name with the eponymous lead, that when he had a really great hit in baseball (and that's pretty often), he needed to get on base and scream, "THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!". It would be nice that other people get that reference now.

(Also, he hasn't actually done it in a game yet. He's too laid back for that.)
 
I mean, I know the first one is a beloved cult classic. I love it myself. But it's honestly, objectively bad. It would be hard to do worse.

Oh wait. I've seen Highlander 2 and 3...nevermind ;) I retract that statement
Okay, but hear me out... what if they focus more on the awesome TV show from the 90's?

I'm cautiously optimistic. This definitely has potential to be good.
 
Okay, but hear me out... what if they focus more on the awesome TV show from the 90's?

I'm cautiously optimistic. This definitely has potential to be good.
Did you see the movie with Adrian Paul and Christopher Lambert? It's uh...something else.
 
Last edited:
Heh, i was wondering what the guy from Breaking Bad did with Lambert there for a second...

Then i remembered Duncan's actor name is Adrian Paul...

Oh, and the next one is even worse...
 
Did you see the movie with Aaron Paul and Christopher Lambert? It's uh...something else.
It was shit. But that was more a case of being a sequel to the movie while pulling in the tv show, which is starting off on the wrong foot. I’m saying ignore the movies completely and use the tv series alone as a base.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
It's bad enough that digital color grading has messed with the look of so many Blu-ray releases, compared to the theatrical and DVD releases, but now we've got AI upscaling ruining movies, too?
 
Alex Baldwin the Producer of Rust might be legally liable, but charging Alec Baldwin the actor was always insane.
my friends husband is a attorney, the short sweet answer was "civilly liable as a producer, but not criminally liable as an actor" and that was good enough for me in the conversation.
 
At the very least this was manslaughter. I think he should be responsible to a degree. Not murder.
If you are cleaning your gun and it shots someone then you get charged. This shouldn't be any different.
 
At the very least this was manslaughter. I think he should be responsible to a degree. Not murder.
If you are cleaning your gun and it shots someone then you get charged. This shouldn't be any different.
The usual IANAL (though my sister is) but they are different scenarios. If you are cleaning a gun and it discharges and kills someone, you are the negligent party and that would indeed be manslaughter through negligence.

In the Baldwin scenario though, the question becomes who is the negligent party. Is it the actor (and producer) who fires a live gun thinking it's cold, or is it whoever was responsible for giving him a live gun and telling him it wasn't? That's what the court case was to decide.
 
When it happened I saw a million people in the film industry say that Baldwin opening the gun to check it would’ve been a massive safety violation.
 
I mean, there's a reason why there's someone on set who's whole job is to make sure the props are safe.

This would be like an electrician screwing something up and then punishing the guy that tried turning on the lights to his house.
 
There is a lot of reports. I’ve heard even that Baldwin was running a pretty dangerous operation by allowing people to have fun and shoot guns at targets at a different location of the set.
Could be a complete rumor though.
But if any truth to it he needs to be on trial for involuntary manslaughter.
 
But that would be in his capacity as a producer, not as the guy that pulled the trigger.

Same as if he knew the armourer was unqualified.

And he wouldn't even need to be on the set when it happened then.

Also, the charge would be negligent homicide, not manslaughter.
 
Top