You really think Minmax and Forgath would be pleased to be travelling around with an evil dickwad whose morality offends them? They might be more effective in battle or dungeons, but that's hardly a good trade-off. What can be put-up with at a gaming table for a few hours a week is really vastly different from what is ideal for real people. People who make decisions to endure someone like Goblinslayer in real life end up worse off because he's a negative element despite his stats being an advantage. Long term he would have been in conflict with Minmax and Forgath on a personal level. In the real world such radical differences in personality either result in silent unhappiness, outright conflict or one side or the other having to change. Most of the time, it's the good people who end up corrupting their morals more and more over time when they make practical choices that violate their ethics for the sake of power.
In one word, absolutely, Minmax and Forgath would have been pleased. They are adventurers by trade, which is a very risky profession where they face violent death on a constant basis. What they are doing is not having fun with friends, it is killing things and taking their stuff. The adventuring skills of Goblinslayer are what would have kept them alive, and the money rolling in.
Dellyn was the best chance they had of both successfully completing their present quest of taking out the goblin adventuring party, and making it to the high levels themselves. And they blew it because Minmax let his emotions get the better of him, a mistake which may end up costing them their lives.
Are you serious? I'm not talking about "displaying mild emotion", I'm talking about genuinely being happy at a party. I'm talking about feeling a sense of joy at completing work. I'm talking about just being happy to be with people you like, instead of trying to figure out if there's any "important" things you need to talk about while you're together.
Enjoying yourself at a party is nice. Making the best use of the time you spend there by turning it into both nice and productive is better. I suppose it is possible some people may find it hard or distasteful to combine the two, though the ones who do it successfully may go home with a little more than the ones who do not. And such small things accumulate.
I'm beginning to think we're not even talking about the same thing when we say "emotion". The five basic emotions: Happiness/joy, anger, fear, sadness and guilt.
Possibly we aren't. The emotions previously featured in the discussion were, as I recall, hatred and love.
If there is confusion on the point, then please understand that I'm certainly not disputing their existence, merely their utility in decision making.
This is what I've been told by experts: people who ignore either their emotions, or their intellect, and make decisions based mostly on one or the other often end up making bad decisions that result in dysfunction.
Bad decisions in terms of results obtained, or from the point of view of emotional development or some similar factor?
This may be an expectation in a lot of places, but its absurd to think its how reality works. Adults are, quite often, governed by their emotions. They just hide it better.
Certainly, and I doubt anyone in this thread is claiming otherwise. I believe it is the utility of emotions in decision making that is under discussion here, not the existence of emotions in individuals, or the assumption that many are ruled by them.
"Your eyes are full of hate, Ben Hur. That is good. Hate keeps a man alive."
"Grief? They beat that out of me in the first year. Hatred was stronger, and it took five years until my heart was closed to all emotion."