How do I share a brain wave pattern with you and everyone in your house?!Li'l Z said the same thing (sans Belligerent part). I guess it's time for a rebranding!
View attachment 39326
What?!The first one is obviously Black Widowman.
Clearly, the answer is Phil Spiderman, guys. We're not using the "made-up names".
Is this a Mass Effect reference? I feel like this is a Mass Effect reference.This is my favorite movie in the theater.
--Patrick
A student, but also a friend?What's a Palawan?
I'm not your friendawan, buddylawan...A student, but also a friend?
That looks really good for a tv showBaymax!
It really feels like Hulu was the weakest link of the entire package, especially since it can be used for free with ads. I'm not surprised Disney is pushing so hard for people to get onboard with Hulu, if only so they have a place to dump stuff they don't want to have the "Disney branding" they'd get on Disney +.hulu live is raising their rates by $5/month, but also adding Disney+ and ESPN+ to the package.
If not for the live TV option, I wouldn't be using hulu at all. But it's nice to come home on a Saturday or Sunday morning, and F1 or Premiership football is on. Or wake up on certain nights to college football or NFL.It really feels like Hulu was the weakest link of the entire package
Honestly, my favorite part of the entire movie is during "We Don't Talk about Bruno"...Spoilers for Encanto:
How does Batman not using bat iconography change the movie in the slightest?How does her beauty not being derived from her white skin change the story in the slightest?
Owlman movie pls...How does Batman not using bat iconography change the movie in the slightest?
Heh... poor Ted.why in Watchmen the obvious Batman stand-in was an owl.
But you wouldn't call it "Batman" if the main character dressed like an owl.The Bat-Cave and the whole “hiding in the shadows at night” part is very tied to the Bat theme. I suppose you could replace it with another nocturnal thing like an owl and be fairly similar which is probably why in Watchmen the obvious Batman stand-in was an owl.
I don't know if it would change the story, but it should definitely change the title.How does her beauty not being derived from her white skin change the story in the slightest?
No reason not to play with the formula, counter expectations, etc. to make something new.
Surprisingly not Disney.I don't know if it would change the story, but it should definitely change the title.
View attachment 40385
Let's hope they do a better job this time.
--Patrick
You are getting a little too caught up on how her name is based on the original story, and not thinking about how they will change it so her name derives from something else. Just because the original name was derived from her skin color does not mean the story can't change so that she gets her name through other means, like her white teeth, or maybe she was born on a snowy day, or maybe it was a pet name given by the queen as an insult to her darker skin, who knows, we sure don't. She is fictional, so they can really do anything with her while retaining name cohesiveness.Snow White? HER LITERAL NAME IS LINKED TO HER LOOKING as white as snow. She is described as white as snow with raven hair, and she is the absolute exemplar of the beauty ideal of being as white as porcelain from not having to go outdoors etc etc.
This is a false comparison. Batman isn't his name, it's his alias. His name isn't John Batman, and he designed the persona of Batman and it's iconography specifically around that. This is why say, Spider-Man can be both Peter Parker AND Mile Morales AND Miguel O'Hara. Snow White isn't an alias crafted by her for a purpose, but a name given to her due to a specific thing that happened while she was born. Whether this is her snow white skin being born on a snowy day, or a new variation, it can still be Snow White without breaking any rules, because they don't have any rules. "EVENT AT BIRTH + SNOW = SNOW WHITE" That is the only variable that needs to be true, everything else is fluid, just like "GUY + BAT ALIAS / ICONS = BATMAN" whether it's Bruce Wayne, Damien Wayne, or Terry McGinnis.It may be an outdated beauty ideal, and you may think it's silly, but....This is like making a Batman movie, "but since bats get a bad rap as creatures of the night, we'll be using goat iconography". Could be a great movie, but it's not batman at that point.
Yet another false comparison. Snow White is a fictional character and thus isn't set in a specific mold of history. Winston Churchill actually existed, and so unless the movie was a parody (Like Hitler in JoJo Rabbit) they wouldn't just get Idris Elba to play him. The dude has living family that would probably take issue with that, Snow White never existed to have family.It may well be fair to say Snow White is a story that can't really be retold properly with modern sensibilities - it's about the beauty of white, the hard-working big-nosed social recluseJewishdwarfslittle men, it's one big walking cliche. A re-interpretation (Huntsman, and what have you) is perfectly fine, the themes are of course fairly universal. But....Yeah, this one is probably the first where I do feel like they'll make a movie with a black guy playing Churchill* soon.