Steve said:
Breaking news: Internet nerds complain about a movie. Film at eleven.
Nerds complain because it wasn't exactly like their nostalgia-filtered memories from their childhood. I'm complaining because it's a poorly made film.
I'm talking about the first movie, here. I don't plan on seeing the second one, but most reviews support this view of it anyway.
A Troll said:
:eyeroll:
And I'm out folks. Please enjoy the rest of your thread.
What will become of this thread without the insightful comments of A Troll?
Steve said:
Considering the source material who in the world expects this to be The Crying Game?
Here's why this is a completely retarded argument: no one is saying they expect or even want Transformers to aspire to high art. There are plenty of legitimately great movies that aren't high art and don't try to be: Die Hard, Jurassic Park, Them!, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Thing, Evil Dead II. These are great movies. What they have and what Transformers lacks is tight scripting, imaginative direction, interesting characters. That is to say, they are extremely well-made films that provide unique experiences. No one wants Citizen Kane every time, and it's stupid to imply that. It is moronic and ridiculous.
Essentially, just because a film does not aspire to be high art does not excuse mediocrity.
-- Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:34 pm --
ThatNickGuy said:
It's a two plus hour live action adaptation of an 80s half hour animated toy commercial? Honestly, to expect any kind of decent plot or even ANY kind of character development is setting the bar too high.
I don't think expecting a film to not insult my intelligence by rewarding stupidity is setting the bar too high, tbqh