Well, it might be...once the game finally gets released in Australia in 2018, that is.I bet the Australian version is basically just this screen for 20 hours.
It's okay, AMERICA can handle it.
Man, I kind of want to play the censored European version of Stick of Truth now.
Probably redundant levels of textures that your machine isn't using.Ok, Titanfall is a fun game. It's well made and runs smooth. That's because it's designed for low spec stuff and genuinely goes for performance over high end visual quality. This is a fact. The textures are definitely not impressive. Any gaming rig from the last 5 years can run this game 60+ frames easy and that's good. That's what should be important in a multiplayer shooter.
So what God damn excuse is it that the game requires a 50 gig install?
Techncially Titanfall is an MMO.Jesus MMOs aren't even that big. The biggest I have is Tera, at about 30GB.
PC gaming?Well, I considered dropping South Park: The Stick of Truth until there's a lower price, but my wife wants it now, so who can guess where this is going?
That's for The Banner Saga and nothing else.PC gaming?
I watch TV on my PC.That's for The Banner Saga and nothing else.
South Park is a TV show so it goes on the TV.
For both my Skyrim playthroughs so far, my wife's been at my side during character creation, telling me what sort of character I should create. I wanted to play as an Argonian but she said no, the lizards are ugly, play as a human instead. Then she had me cycle through all possible combinations of hairstyle and facial features, until she settled on one she felt was acceptable.
I'm kinda wondering what'll happen when I fire up Saints Row 3 again. The character customization in there is tons of fun.
They gave it a "NOT YET".I wish I could spend this entire review talking about how South Park: The Stick of Truth is one of the funniest games I've ever played.
But Stick of Truth, out Tuesday for 360, PS3, and PC, is a game marred by bugs and technical issues, and it is impossible to separate the art from the faulty product surrounding it.
Kotaku's writer is a bit up his own ass about things.Uh oh:
from Kotaku's review:
They gave it a "NOT YET".
Sounds like all the issues may be fixable by patches but… guess we will see. Glad I'm not dropping 60 bucks on a buggy game.
Yeah, I'm pretty stoked. Been waiting for another Arkham game since City. Good thing they didn't have an outside studio make a shitty, rushed product with tons of bugs that they won't fix because they want to focus on DLC to milk more money from the audience.The next Arkham game has been announced. It shall be Batman: Arkham Knight.
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/gamenews.php?id=115550
Two plusses for me about it:
1. Rocksteady is back to make this one.
2. You finally get to drive the Batmobile.
Well, any game review must be taken for what it is, but if someone is having issues with performance on their console it's a good thing to be aware of. It's certainly not unheard of. Keep in mind, the reviewer LOVES the game, he's just bummed that (at least on the xbox) he's having technical issues.One must take anything on Kotaku with great big grains of sea salt.
Thats a good sign they are on the ball.Just brought home PS3 version; will report tonight if there's any glitches.
I will note that the moment I popped it in, there was a patch.