http://www.oxm.co.uk/47898/reviews/family-guy-back-to-the-multiverse-review/#null
My objective review score is a 1/10!
My objective review score is a 1/10!
[Gaming] The Greatest Game Review Ever; That Shitty New Family Guy Game
- Thread starter Frank
- Start date
- Status
Was the 1 pirates? Because if so, I think we have the same score.
Under the current state of inflated gaming scores, a 6/10 on IGN is a -3 on any normal scale.
The multiverse, one of the most unfathomable concepts by man....and the most they come up with is a pirate level. Insert Family Guy is low on ideas joke here.
As do I, but from what I've seen from this review and other reviews though it has JUST a pirate level. An entire freaking multiverse, where literally ANYTHING can happen and the most this game could think of was something that all ready bloody exists! For fucks sake, some imagination is all I ask!
Yeah, I'd just like the echo the sentiment that a 6/10 from IGN is basically a zero.
A tie-in game to a movie or TV show greatly lacks in quality?
I, for one, am shocked. Shocked, I tell you.
I, for one, am shocked. Shocked, I tell you.
Apparently some of the Spider-Man games were pretty good. Outside of that, I can't think of many others. Toy Story, I guess.
GasBandit
Staff member
I still maintain goldeneye was horrible. It's just console players had never played a 3D fps before, so their first piece of chocolate was something carried around in an armpit for a week... was still the best chocolate they ever tasted. Goldeneye came out the same time as Duke3D and Quake 2.
Singing goldeneye's praises because it was the first console FPS is like saying this:
revolutionized the portable phone industry.
That said, the batman movie game for NES wasn't bad.
Ravenpoe knows what's up. Some old school movie games were bad ass.
I'm gonna add
.jpg)
And it's sequels.
All the Disney NES games by Capcom were top notch, even ones like The Little Mermaid.
And there are a few cases of more modern movie games being excellent (and even better than the movies they're based on)
I'm gonna add
And it's sequels.
All the Disney NES games by Capcom were top notch, even ones like The Little Mermaid.
And there are a few cases of more modern movie games being excellent (and even better than the movies they're based on)
There's also The Warriors, which is a movie game 30+ years after the fact.
Didn't read all the posts in the thread.
SNES/Genesis had the largest stable of great movie/cartoon spinoff games. I'd say any Disney IP done in the Capcom era is pretty top-notch (Mickey platformers, Goof Troop, etc). There's also the Data East Addams' Family games, which were fun (but holy shit they were hard).
Nintendo hard.
Yeah, I mean I wouldn't put them at Ghosts 'n' Goblins hard, but still. Maybe a few notches under Contra.
I remember the Addams Family Values game on the SNES had NOTHING to do with the movie, yet was excellent and hard as fuck.
It was entirely a Master Blaster clone. The shots you fired and many of the enemies were ripped directly from that game. It was still AMAZING.
I think Pugsley's Quest was the only one to tie in to something of the modern AF reboots, in the form of the 90's cartoon. The rest seemed to show up around the time the cartoon and movies were big, but didn't tie to any of them.
Goldeneye 64 came out in 1997. Honestly, what FPS games before '97 blew Goldeneye out of the water? Jedi Knight came out in '97 and it was good, but it was just a different kind of game. I certainly don't think either Doom or Duke Nukem stood up to 007 technically and Goldeneye finally started the push from beyond "KILL ALL MONSTERS". I think it's rightfully so called a landmark game in the FPS genre.
It's the first landmark for console FPS multiplayer. In terms of FPS multiplayer in general, though, it's really Quake and later Unreal Tournament that took it to a whole new level.
- Status