My wife and I are looking as well since I'll be graduating soon. If this state wants to go back to the stone age and stop using critical thinking, time to go somewhere less stupid. I don't want to be here to watch Walker flush the place down the Detroit Michigan toilet.I can only hope I still have the opportunity to retire early - which would be before the next gubernatorial election - so I can GTFO of this state.
Coleman Young left such a mark, and Kwame didn't exactly work towards turning it around.My wife and I are looking as well since I'll be graduating soon. If this state wants to go back to the stone age and stop using critical thinking, time to go somewhere less stupid. I don't want to be here to watch Walker flush the place down the Detroit Michigan toilet.
http://techraptor.net/content/obama-endorses-net-neutralityBrace yourselves, I'm about to praise Obama.http://techraptor.net/content/obama-endorses-net-neutrality
I would still like to see some anti-trust actions taken before we settle in on strict regulations. There's demonstrable evidence that having more than a single cable level broadband provider option benefits consumers both in price and speed. I worry that title 2 is just going to stagnate the industry and be used to keep out competitors like (for lack of another national player making in roads) Google Fiber.Brace yourselves, I'm about to praise Obama.
http://techraptor.net/content/obama-endorses-net-neutrality
President Obama has released a clear statement in favor of net neutrality, and classifying ISPs as Title 2 common carriers. I'm a libertarian and all that, but the fact of the matter is that internet access is de facto infrastructure, and too many large companies are engaging in too many anticompetitive practices - indeed, the very nature of building infrastructure (for example, laying the physical network architecture) is already anathema to competition. So if competition isn't possible, then strict, transparent regulation is needed. It's time to make Comcast close up the nipple flaps for the last time.
There is no shame in praising good decisions, regardless of their source.Brace yourselves, I'm about to praise Obama.
I'm pretty sure that's par for the course for Ted Cruz.One of my state's senators, Ted Cruz, doesn't agree with me. He calls this "Obamacare for the internet."
Bad Ted, no biscuit.
I usually am a fan of Ted Cruz' shenanigans. Not so on this subject.I'm pretty sure that's par for the course for Ted Cruz.
I hate rabble.ca so much. Just because there's an administration he doesn't agree with, now he's ashamed? All of the good things about Canada are now gone? Oh brother.*sigh* And I used to consider myself a proud Canadian.
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/northern-plains-drifter/2013/10/taking-canadian-flag-our-backpacks
Ted Cruz is an embarrassment toI usually am a fan of Ted Cruz' shenanigans. Not so on this subject.
... to?Ted Cruz is an embarrassment to
... to butt toilets.Treat it like a Mad Lib
I did look up his contributors as soon as I heard. Telecom was #19 on the list, I think?
Well, so much for ignoring. Le sigh.
There is one catch-all thread. It's not like I was super excited it was started by GB. There is ONE poster on my ignore list now and it's pretty much pointless. I disagree with a whole lot more than him, in case you hadn't noticed
I'm just tossing this out there, but if you can't handle reading the views of someone you disagree with, maybe you should avoid politics threads.
Especially if that politic thread is labeled "Guy who you don't ever want to read the opinions of's politics thread"
He has me on ignore for a reason (that had nothing to do with my politics) that was perfectly valid when he did so, something like 4 years ago. I won't bother trying to convince him to "give me another chance" because frankly I don't care enough to do so - I got all I can toe already. If Dave can figure out how to make it possible to ignore posts by admins, then alrighty. It's no skin off my nose either way.
I'm just tossing this out there, but if you can't handle reading the views of someone you disagree with, maybe you should avoid politics threads.
Especially if that politic thread is labeled "Guy who you don't ever want to read the opinions of's politics thread"
I admit, sir, you've piqued my interest.He has me on ignore for a reason (that had nothing to do with my politics) that was perfectly valid when he did so, something like 4 years ago. I won't bother trying to convince him to "give me another chance" because frankly I don't care enough to do so - I got all I can toe already. If Dave can figure out how to make it possible to ignore posts by admins, then alrighty. It's no skin off my nose either way.