You shut your whore mouth! Bread pudding is as delicious as a properly cooked, well-done steak!
[News] The USA Police State will never satisfy its lust for beating, gassing, and imprisoning minorities
- Thread starter Charlie Don't Surf
- Start date
In British English, "pudding" basically means dessert. You have sentences like "you can't have any pudding if you don't eat your veg."
So a bread pudding basically means "bread-based sweet thing".
Also, bread pudding is awesome, and I will sexually harass anyone who says otherwise.
GasBandit
Staff member
I challenge you to tell me how black pudding is "sweet."
Fair enough. Should have quoted them.
Ftfy
Bread Pudding on red berry compote is crazy delicious.
I know the discussion has moved on, but I felt like sharing this.
The movie Selma is coming out in a couple weeks and I wonder who at the time those events took place saw the photos of what happened back then and thought "They should've just done what the police said." Certainly my grandparents.
The movie Selma is coming out in a couple weeks and I wonder who at the time those events took place saw the photos of what happened back then and thought "They should've just done what the police said." Certainly my grandparents.
GasBandit
Staff member
PUDDING MOTHER FUCKER DO YOU EAT ITI know the discussion has moved on, but I felt like sharing this.
The movie Selma is coming out in a couple weeks and I wonder who at the time those events took place saw the photos of what happened back then and thought "They should've just done what the police said." Certainly my grandparents.
Only pie is the truest dessert.
The USA Police State will never satisfy its lust for
--Patrick
*grabs your butt*Bread pudding is disgusting
(I've never actually had bread pudding)
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingn...-twitter-users-seize-ex-boulder-cop-convicted
But at least Boulder folks also protested the killing of an actual human being
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_27090627/boulder-sheriff-planned-protest-shut-down-u-s
more here: http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_25885253
lol
just gonna throw a little guess out there, the outrage came from rich people?
But at least Boulder folks also protested the killing of an actual human being
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/boulder/ci_27090627/boulder-sheriff-planned-protest-shut-down-u-s
GasBandit
Staff member
It's Boulder. There are no poor people there, unless you count CU students who've rolled up all the spending money their parents gave them, packed it in a bowl and blazed it up. Homeless types would tend to freeze to death.
(I'm speaking in hyperbole - Boulder is a notorious party/college town up in the mountains just northwest of Denver. Many of the people I went to high school with ended up there, and spent most of their time in a stinky blue haze. I was kind of the odd man out, going to New Mexico Tech instead.)
So... peyote instead of marijuana?
oh yeah, I know, but just pointing out the disparity between Boulder and Ferguson...
Also, most of the "needs a lock" I understand and/or don't care about, but for that post? Really, @DarkAudit ?
Lt Daniel Furseth said:
I know the discussion has moved on, but I felt like sharing this.
The movie Selma is coming out in a couple weeks and I wonder who at the time those events took place saw the photos of what happened back then and thought "They should've just done what the police said." Certainly my grandparents.
I hope he resigns his post.
Yeah, Lt. Daniel Furseth can go fuck himself.
People are upset because the police are over-militarized, with assault rifles and armored vehicles on the streets of American cities. Because there are too many SWAT deployments, with over 1,000 per week despite crime rates remaining roughly the same or even dropping. Because 3/4s of all SWAT raids are to conduct search warrants on people only suspected of a crime. Because some police tend to use maximum force instead of minimal force. Because they shoot people's dogs just because the dog MIGHT be a threat while conducting a raid on an adjacent property. Because of the abuses of civil forfeiture. Because flash-bangs get thrown into baby's cribs, maiming the infant in order to seize an ounce or two of a controlled substance. Because I typed "woman dies in police custody" into google and had 4 different cases on the first fucking page.
People are pissed because the police in many places seem less like the friendly cop serving and protecting your community anymore, and more like armored stormtroopers treating your community like it's downtown Fallujah. People are pissed there have been several high profile cases of questionable uses of force, and in some cases blatant abuses of the power we give police, that haven't even been considered worthy of a trial. People are pissed because unarmed suspects were killed by police without repercussion or even a full inquiry.
People are pissed because the good cops, that we *know* are the vast majority, side with the bad cops and take offense to any implication that any police officer has done wrong ever. The blue wall doesn't protect good cops from slander, it taints good cops with the misdeeds of the bad.
And then you get whiny posts from police lieutenants who show that they don't even fucking understand what the fucking problem is, which is in and of itself, PART OF THE FUCKING PROBLEM.
People are upset because the police are over-militarized, with assault rifles and armored vehicles on the streets of American cities. Because there are too many SWAT deployments, with over 1,000 per week despite crime rates remaining roughly the same or even dropping. Because 3/4s of all SWAT raids are to conduct search warrants on people only suspected of a crime. Because some police tend to use maximum force instead of minimal force. Because they shoot people's dogs just because the dog MIGHT be a threat while conducting a raid on an adjacent property. Because of the abuses of civil forfeiture. Because flash-bangs get thrown into baby's cribs, maiming the infant in order to seize an ounce or two of a controlled substance. Because I typed "woman dies in police custody" into google and had 4 different cases on the first fucking page.
People are pissed because the police in many places seem less like the friendly cop serving and protecting your community anymore, and more like armored stormtroopers treating your community like it's downtown Fallujah. People are pissed there have been several high profile cases of questionable uses of force, and in some cases blatant abuses of the power we give police, that haven't even been considered worthy of a trial. People are pissed because unarmed suspects were killed by police without repercussion or even a full inquiry.
People are pissed because the good cops, that we *know* are the vast majority, side with the bad cops and take offense to any implication that any police officer has done wrong ever. The blue wall doesn't protect good cops from slander, it taints good cops with the misdeeds of the bad.
And then you get whiny posts from police lieutenants who show that they don't even fucking understand what the fucking problem is, which is in and of itself, PART OF THE FUCKING PROBLEM.
You are only supposed to raid the homes of suspects.
There are many places in America that are as dangerous as Fallujah.
Whatever
about the "blue wall."
He likely understands the issues far better than you do.
There are many places in America that are as dangerous as Fallujah.
Whatever
about the "blue wall."He likely understands the issues far better than you do.
But here's the thing, Six.
SWAT teams were formed to deal with armed shootouts where the suspects outgunned regular police (ie the North Hollywood bank robbery shoot-out), confronting heavily armed criminals, performing hostage rescue and counter-terrorism operations, high risk arrests, and entering armored or barricaded buildings. All of these are outside the scope of regular police training. They are all high-risk, immediate action required situations where the risk of death and near-certainty of injury was justified by the circumstances.
Now you have SWAT teams essentially conducting home invasions for miniscule amounts of drugs, where the suspects are often unarmed and do not have a history of violence. There is no way that there are 130+ hostage situations, barricaded building assaults, and counter-terrorism operations EVERY SINGLE DAY in the United States. Yet that is the rate of deployment for SWAT teams. SWAT should be the heavy backup in case of trouble, not the first and only option. And that leads to ridiculous tragedies, like the aforementioned infant whose face was mutilated by a flash-bang, or an internet gambler who was killed by the Fairfax, Virginia SWAT team in 2006. Hell, let's not forget that people playing fucking online video games can call the police and have a raid conducted on you (aka SWATing). The fact that such raids are conducted with so little evidence or forethought - doesn't that bother you?
There are many places in the US as dangerous as an active war zone? Okay, name 3 places where police need armored vehicles to keep order.
SWAT teams were formed to deal with armed shootouts where the suspects outgunned regular police (ie the North Hollywood bank robbery shoot-out), confronting heavily armed criminals, performing hostage rescue and counter-terrorism operations, high risk arrests, and entering armored or barricaded buildings. All of these are outside the scope of regular police training. They are all high-risk, immediate action required situations where the risk of death and near-certainty of injury was justified by the circumstances.
Now you have SWAT teams essentially conducting home invasions for miniscule amounts of drugs, where the suspects are often unarmed and do not have a history of violence. There is no way that there are 130+ hostage situations, barricaded building assaults, and counter-terrorism operations EVERY SINGLE DAY in the United States. Yet that is the rate of deployment for SWAT teams. SWAT should be the heavy backup in case of trouble, not the first and only option. And that leads to ridiculous tragedies, like the aforementioned infant whose face was mutilated by a flash-bang, or an internet gambler who was killed by the Fairfax, Virginia SWAT team in 2006. Hell, let's not forget that people playing fucking online video games can call the police and have a raid conducted on you (aka SWATing). The fact that such raids are conducted with so little evidence or forethought - doesn't that bother you?
There are many places in the US as dangerous as an active war zone? Okay, name 3 places where police need armored vehicles to keep order.
You don't see it as a problem that good police cover up for the bad ones?Whatever
It must be disheartening to know mothers tell their children to be terrified of you when you genuinely want to help them protect those children.
Especially when it's a systemic problem, that even if you did stand up to it as an individual to try to change it from within, you can be demoted, fired, or even get killed.
Especially when it's a systemic problem, that even if you did stand up to it as an individual to try to change it from within, you can be demoted, fired, or even get killed.
The Police can't control when their gun goes off into the chest of an unarmed black man? let's give them 3 days' weapons training
Oh, come on now. That's like suggesting someone can't prevent their finger from clicking the "Post Reply" button.The Police can't control when their gun goes off into the chest of an unarmed black man? let's give them 3 days' weapons training
--Patrick