...you're not surprised that you're not in here frothing at the mouth?I'm zero percent surprised
He might have been waving a car past. Not sure though. Clearly more investigation is needed.idk. I think it's a set up. at 1:53 he waves "someone" through a crosswalk, then he turns, and you don't see anyone on the sidewalk. PHOTOSHOP!
sticking point appears to be "knowingly" violated civil rights, which is a pretty high bar. Institutional, implicit racism won't meet that standard, even if present.Looks like the Fed's did not find enough evidence to charge Darren Wilson of civil rights violations.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/21/us/ferguson-darren-wilson-civil-rights-charges/index.html
There is an interesting trend on Twitter because of this story:So apparently the North Miami Beach police department use actual photographs of black teenagers - not silhouettes, not illustrations of armed criminals, just mugshots of black teenagers - for target practice.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ce-target-practice-mug-shots-blacks/21834491/
I'm pretty sure that's the point of all of this.That's kind of a cute sentiment, and I appreciate what they're trying to do, but I have to agree with @sixpackshaker that it's pretty monstrous to use pictures of actual people, period.
Yes, I just upped the ante in a way that might actually hit home. Not everyone likes/cares about people-of-the-cloth (depending on the religion/church).I'm pretty sure that's the point of all of this.
Judging from the cloud flying back into the officers, it looks like she also maced herself and the other officers as well.Short female bike cop in Seattle goes into full panic mode, starts spraying everybody in sight.
The guy on the phone is suing for $500,000. Seattle PD has a history (documented by and reprimanded as a result of federal investigation) of unnecessary overuse of violence.
Didn't appear that way to me.Judging from the cloud flying back into the officers, it looks like she also maced herself and the other officers as well.
At the 8 second mark, she just sprays out at nothing, and it appears like the mist is blown back towards her and the officers.Didn't appear that way to me.
Look, when you spend that much on a counter-terrorism squad, you have to find something for them to do once you find out there isn't a lot of terrorism to counter.NYPD announces new counterterrorism unit... that will also handle protesters.
What's scarier to me is this line of thinking apparently came from the Department of Defense.
Hey, if you don't protest, you don't have anything to worry about. ::snark::NYPD announces new counterterrorism unit... that will also handle protesters.
What's scarier to me is this line of thinking apparently came from the Department of Defense.
Land of the Free™ at it again.Remember that whole "right to have an attorney present" thing? A public defender has been arrested because she refused to let police interrogate her client without her being present. Arrested for resisting arrest - logically, wouldn't you have to be in the process of being arrested for something ELSE before you can resist arrest?
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...or-intervening-between-police-and-her-client/
"Acceptable losses" to get her out of the room momentarily for some purpose, I suspect. They had to know it wouldn't stand and would cause more trouble later.Police officers
In the United States and other jurisdictions, police officers and other government officials are shielded from false arrest lawsuits through the doctrine of qualified immunity. This doctrine protects such officials from liability when engaged in discretionary actions such as arrests of suspects. However, the officer's actions must still not violate "clearly established law," or this protection is void.
Honestly I think it's more of an attitude that, "We're going to do what the fuck we want here, and if you get in our way we'll arrest you, legitimate reason or not.""Acceptable losses" to get her out of the room momentarily for some purpose, I suspect. They had to know it wouldn't stand and would cause more trouble later.
--Patrick
That's fairly close to the attitude that I get from my cop friends when they post stuff like this on FB and laugh.Honestly I think it's more of an attitude that, "We're going to do what the fuck we want here, and if you get in our way we'll arrest you, legitimate reason or not."
Especially since the whole relevance of the "I can't breathe" thing is because the dude fucking died from it.That's fairly close to the attitude that I get from my cop friends when they post stuff like this on FB and laugh.
View attachment 17407
Yes, and what bothered me was their response after I posted a remark in response to that comic asking them if they thought Garner deserved to die from that incident. Two officer friends of mine responded thusly:Especially since the whole relevance of the "I can't breathe" thing is because the dude fucking died from it.
I know most cops are good, but their social media presence often comes off as a bunch of posturing thugs who react to every criticism with outrage, sociopathic humor, and veiled threats.
Then the arresting officer will most likely be convicted of a misdemeanor, and either get fined or put on probation.Honestly I think it's more of an attitude that, "We're going to do what the fuck we want here, and if you get in our way we'll arrest you, legitimate reason or not."
If the prosecutor pushes for an indictment, which is extremely unlikely. It's much more likely he'll get an official reprimand, desk duty for a week or two, and basically a slap on the wrist, all handled internally without files charged.Then the arresting officer will most likely be convicted of a misdemeanor, and either get fined or put on probation.
Eventually.
--Patrick
And that's the end of the story, isn't it. 1 guess as to the nothing that will likely happen to the TSA official.Everything anyone hates about a police organization is tenfold worse in the TSA.
Roger Vanderklok was trying to make his flight to Miami. After a misunderstanding with a TSA agent, he spent 30 minutes being searched. When he asked about filing a complaint against the agent, he was arrested.
Vanderklok had a packet of PowerBars and a heart-monitoring watch in his carry-on bag that looked suspicious going through the x-ray machine. While his bags were being searched, the TSA agent asked if there was any “organic materials” in the bag. Thinking that this meant fruits or vegetables, Vanderlock told the agent no.
After the agents had spent 30 minutes checking his bag, the items were found to be harmless, and Vanderklok was free to go. Upset about the misunderstanding, he told the agent that if he had just explained what organic material meant (PowerBars contain milk, grain and sugar and are considered organic matter.) all of the wasted time could have been avoided. When the agent became confrontational, Vanderklok asked to file a complaint. The agent then confiscated his belongings, called the Philadelphia Police, and accused Vanderklok of “threatening the placement of a bomb” and making “terroristic threats.”
According to Philly.com, “Vanderklok was taken to an airport holding cell, and his personal belongings – including his phone – were confiscated while police “investigated” him.”
After spending 20 hours in jail, Vanderklok’s wife bailed him out. When the dispute went to trial, he was cleared of all charges after surveillance footage backed up his account against the TSA’s claims.
Vanderklok was detained for three hours in the holding cell, missing his plane. Then he was handcuffed, taken to the 18th District at 55th and Pine and placed in another cell.
He says that no one – neither the police officers at the airport nor the detectives at the 18th – told him why he was there. He didn’t find out until he was arraigned at 2 a.m. that he was being charged with “threatening the placement of a bomb” and making “terroristic threats.”
Via Philly.com
Government never reduces.[DOUBLEPOST=1423248336,1423248265][/DOUBLEPOST]As corrupt, worthless and horrible as the TSA is, no politician will ever cut 100,000 jobs.
A suit has now been filed.. we'll see if it gets any traction, but I suspect you are right.And that's the end of the story, isn't it. 1 guess as to the nothing that will likely happen to the TSA official.
They probably either forgot the camera was there or didn't know which folder on which computer the footage was available on.Surprised the surveillance footage was still available.