True. They might be a Jewish attorney.C’mon, they’re on the Internet, you know there’s no guarantee they’re really black.
—Patrick
Oh, god, even more proof I'm racist. My attorney is Arabic!
True. They might be a Jewish attorney.C’mon, they’re on the Internet, you know there’s no guarantee they’re really black.
—Patrick
Black voters decided an accused pedophile was not worthy of the senate.A slim majority of Alabama citizens decided an accused pedophile is NOT worthy of the Senate. There may be some hope down south after all.
Brace for the Twitter tantrum.
Truth.Black voters decided an accused pedophile was not worthy of the senate.
You know when your candidate has a history of molesting teenage girls and saying that things were better under slavery, you fucked up.You know when Alabama goes blue, you fucked up.
This. Alabama has some truly nasty voter suppression tactics in place. Next thing there needs to be wiping that shit out.I saw a lot of reports on attempted voter suppression in Alabama too, so even better that Jones won.
...without it looking too much like a remake of the beginning of Blazing Saddles, you mean.The next thing on the GOP's mind won't be how to avoid backing a pedophile, it'll be how can they stop this from happening again.
That is up to local government, the guy who was elected was to a national branch.Keep in mind that I don't understand how a lot of politics work, but now that a Democrat is senator, can they do things to repeal and prevent the voter suppression?
When that 98% is voting against someone who's literally said that America was better during slavery and that it's problems would be solved if not only black people, but women, couldn't vote, I'm not surprised that 98% of black women said nope.I'm just wondering how 98% of people agree on anything. You could say "freedom is good!" and not get 98%. "Cookies are great!" and not get 98%. But "Yay Jones, boo Moore!" and you get 98%? Yikes.
It's because Alabama has a ton of hardcore evangelicals, which would be considered an insane cult if there weren't so many of them.I have to wonder why none of you are capable of understanding why someone might choose one over the other, knowing all the pieces about each of them that you know.
Do any of you have the ability to understand people with differing priorities and desires, or are you all so narrow minded that you are incapable of such empathy?
Please don’t take this as an endorsement of Moore. I don’t like him and I don’t know much about the other person except what others are saying about him.
But if America continues, like many of you, to actively refuse to try and understand the other side, we will most assuredly get worse than better.
I wonder:You know when your candidate has a history of molesting teenage girls and saying that things were better under slavery, you fucked up.
He isI just wonder if Roy Moore was truly the pro-slavery child-molesting dirtbag that some interest groups seem to make him out to be.
Well, he said one way to fix a lot of problems in the US is to get rid of every amendment after the 10th.I wonder:
Did Roy Moore ever say that slavery was a better condition than the one that is currently prevailing? Or did he actually say that, on balance, things were better in that specific time period, regardless of the evils of slavery? I mean, which ever period of history one thinks that their country/state/whatever was at the height of their achievements, I'm sure someone can dig up something that was 'wrong' in the period according to modern interpretation, and spin it to their advantage.
Regarding child molestation, has he ever been convicted of it in accordance with due process, or are we still in the "innocent/guilty until proven otherwise" territory? After all, he was a contender in a senatorial election. I'm not sure all the dirt that gets thrown around at election time is necessarily factually accurate.
To be sure, I'm not saying the voters in Alabama made the wrong decision. They voted according to what they believed was right, based on their knowledge of the candidates at the time, just like we all do. I just wonder if Roy Moore was truly the pro-slavery child-molesting dirtbag that some interest groups seem to make him out to be.
The quote used to vilify him on this matter could be understood either way. I think to understand his position on slavery and racism you'd have to take a look into his history and how he's voted over time in his various elected positions. So I can't really speak to that, but the wikipedia article on him seems comprehensive:I wonder:
Did Roy Moore ever say that slavery was a better condition than the one that is currently prevailing? Or did he actually say that, on balance, things were better in that specific time period, regardless of the evils of slavery? I mean, which ever period of history one thinks that their country/state/whatever was at the height of their achievements, I'm sure someone can dig up something that was 'wrong' in the period according to modern interpretation, and spin it to their advantage.
No, he hasn't. Even assuming the allegations are true the statute of limitations is past so he couldn't be convicted criminally. There's possibility of a civil suit, but it would be hard to press such a case successfully without evidence, and now that he's out of the race there's little incentive for anyone to do so.Regarding child molestation, has he ever been convicted of it in accordance with due process, or are we still in the "innocent/guilty until proven otherwise" territory? After all, he was a contender in a senatorial election. I'm not sure all the dirt that gets thrown around at election time is necessarily factually accurate.