Online, but only some in real life. Don't discount the amount of people who aren't on social media, but hear it about it from friends who are, or friends of friends, and hear people praising Musk, but don't directly see the shithole that Twitter has become.
This just goes on the big pile of "fights I hope both sides lose"#BoycottWalmart is trending on Twitter because conservatives are pissed that Walmart pulled advertising.
They tried that in 2020. Didn’t work.#BoycottWalmart is trending on Twitter because conservatives are pissed that Walmart pulled advertising.
Odd, still works for me...
Firefox does not like to let you see third-party embeds depending on your security settings (this is actually a good thing).
I'd have posted a screenshot of the last tweet I embedded, but a screenshot of video doesn't do much good. Sorry, Frank. (It's just a clip of a Tesla truck, trying to haul a pine tree, getting pulled out a rut by a Ford.)
Yeah they only make trucks and cargo vans but they're technically their own thing now.
Ram has been it's own company for over a decade.
Smells to me like chicanery. I'm not sure in which direction though. Maybe to fool CAFE standards, maybe a tax dodge, maybe something quarterly profits related.... who knows.
I think it was more a part of the restructuring they did when they nearly went under and merged with fiat. It makes more sense to me than the difference between brands like Chevrolet/GMC/Buick. At least the product is different.
My own personal biased non-scientific belief is that the huge swinginess between newer makes of vehicles is both that new trucks are fucking enormous and hard to see 30 feet in front of and the addition of a touchscreen full of options in all new vehicles to add to the things that steal away drivers' attentions is to blame.
There's probably a lot of truth to that too. Sometimes I wonder if people are over reliant on things like their blind spot checker to actually check their surroundings to see if it's safe to change lanes.
Discontinued brands which have fewer and fewer models on the road as time goes on have fewer accidents? Weird.
Oh I thought it was per 1000 drivers of that brand not just overall drivers. My bad yeah that doesn't tell as much as it seems then. Like what are the % those brands occupy the road?
All that says is that people who use QuoteWizard are bad drivers. I wonder how many of them are in the "Male, 18-35" demographic, who can't get (cheap) insurance anywhere else because they are statistically risky drivers no matter what they drive. A real study would have considered that data, because there is a big difference between a 40-year-old (who gets their insurance from State Farm or USAA) and a 22-year-old who can only get insurance off some website using "QuoteWizard". They can both be driving identical cars with the big console screen, but have vastly different probability of an accident that is not the fault of the console screen.I legit cannot believe that those enormous touchpad consoles with no other controls is legal. It's bugnuts insane and is probably one of the reasons why Tesla drivers fucking suck so bad.
Ram, Tesla and Subaru Have the Worst Drivers | LendingTree
Our analysis uses QuoteWizard by LendingTree insurance quote data to determine which car brands have the worst drivers.www.lendingtree.com
It is 1000 drivers per brand, they cite that at the bottom.
I know it's per 1000, I'm just calling out the fact that dividing up by model gets harder when some of those models are getting fewer and far between.
Though I will never believe that backing up should be something done with anything but the utmost care getting into some stupid accidents without major damage is an important right of passage.
It was probably the least expensive and painful way for a zoomer to learn not to trust corporate safety technology.
