The first one is a well-made, fun action revenge movie. They steadily degrade in quality with each sequel thereafter.One of these days I should watch the John Wick movies. I've seen enough Youtube clips of them that I feel like I've seen 50% of them already, one of these days I should actually sit down and watch them.
YES! The last one was all style and no substance. The very epitome of empty calories. People standing next to each other shooting each other with no effect - just dumb no matter what kind of "cloth armor" they have. The plots after the first one were cobbled together bullcrap. The first premise was thin but you could understand it since it was nothing more than simple, single-minded revenge.The first one is a well-made, fun action revenge movie. They steadily degrade in quality with each sequel thereafter.
Agreed. I dug the hell out of the first one, but the series becomes a case of diminishing returns. The first one does all the world building about his secret society in the background details without explaining a thing. That becomes less subtle with every sequel until the series is firmly up its own ass about this world. And the more they try to explain or add to it it, the less it makes sense, logistically.The first one is a well-made, fun action revenge movie. They steadily degrade in quality with each sequel thereafter.
See:The first one is a stone cold classic. The second one is a solid follow-up. It's the third and fourth ones where it gets particularly stupid.
Yeah, several of those, the 2nd one was the disappointment but the 3rd made it better -Yes, except Die Hard - the third one is almost as good as the first.
I counted Toy Story as a Pixar film instead of a Disney film. Agreed on Die Hard.Yeah, I agree with MOST of that list, but I disagree on some. I will always say I liked The Matrix sequels. Are they as good as the original? No, but they're still very good (including Resurrection).
Similarly, yeah, Pirates 1 is the best, but 2 & 3 are solid in their own right. It gets bad after that.
How to Train Your Dragon is a great series. I'd argue 2 is better than 1. 3 is the lesser of the three, but still good in its own right.
Die Hard 1 & 3 are top notch, the rest can be skipped.
"Any Disney movie" implies Toy Story is included. And no, 2 & 3 are surprisingly better than the first, and 4 is fun, too, though the lesser of the bunch.
The rest of the list i can agree with.
I mean I suppose. But I still want to see it.The Electric State
This is what a teaser trailer is now? It seems like it's spelling out the entire plot.
I have stopped watching any trailers for things that I know I will watch because of this.The Electric State
This is what a teaser trailer is now? It seems like it's spelling out the entire plot.
I'm not even playing the trailer, already sold.Love Hurts
Me: So what is this movie?
Love Hurts: Well, it stars Ke Huy Quan and...
Me: SOLD!
Love Hurts: But don't you want to know...
Me: NOPE. I'm already in!
Don't watch the trailer. It give to much of the movie away. That said it feels like a Jackie Chan movie from the early 2000.I'm not even playing the trailer, already sold.
I had the same thought! Although, I'm much happier it's Ke Huy than Jackie.That said it feels like a Jackie Chan movie from the early 2000.
Wait, are you implying that you don’t look like a basket case the rest of the time too?Honestly I stopped watching trailers about 15 years ago. Makes going to the theater interesting because I plug my ears and shut my eyes and then whoever is with me has to tap me when it's safe. I look like a basket case doing it though.
That's been true of trailers for a while now, but teaser trailers used to be short in time and info. Some teaser trailers have just a silhouette, a title, and a release year. I wasn't surprised that a trailer revealed so much, I was surprised that they're calling a full plot rundown a teaser now.I have stopped watching any trailers for things that I know I will watch because of this.
Movies about a suburban dad-type with a “special set of skills” are a dime a dozen nowadays. But Ke Huy Quan absolutely deserves to have a standout one.Love Hurts
Me: So what is this movie?
Love Hurts: Well, it stars Ke Huy Quan and...
Me: SOLD!
Love Hurts: But don't you want to know...
Me: NOPE. I'm already in!
Oh yeah, the concept is pretty boilerplate like something you'd see from Jackie Chan, as Chris pointed out. But I'm 100% in exclusively because of Ke Huy Quan's infectious energy. I hope it does well enough that he gets to a bunch of these, or gets a franchise of his own.Movies about a suburban dad-type with a “special set of skills” are a dime a dozen nowadays. But Ke Huy Quan absolutely deserves to have a standout one.
It's also obvious that Ke Huy Quan is a fan of/inspired by Jackie Chan. He choreographed the fanny pack fight in everything everywhere and that entire sequence is Jackie Chan as all hell.Oh yeah, the concept is pretty boilerplate like something you'd see from Jackie Chan, as Chris pointed out. But I'm 100% in exclusively because of Ke Huy Quan's infectious energy. I hope it does well enough that he gets to a bunch of these, or gets a franchise of his own.
Fun fact: Jackie Chan was originally intended to star in Everything Everywhere All at Once. But then The Daniels decided to gender flip the lead role and cast Michelle Yeoh instead.It's also obvious that Ke Huy Quan is a fan of/inspired by Jackie Chan. He choreographed the fanny pack fight in everything everywhere and that entire sequence is Jackie Chan as all hell.
I’m really glad they did. I love Jackie Chan, but that movie would have just been yet another Jackie Chan movie instead of the outstanding film that it was was. And recasting Chan allowed them to bring in Quan, which reignited just how much we missed him from Hollywood.Fun fact: Jackie Chan was originally intended to star in Everything Everywhere All at Once. But then The Daniels decided to gender flip the lead role and cast Michelle Yeoh instead.
Well, whatever the baseline is, it's a force multiplier.Wait, are you implying that you don’t look like a basket case the rest of the time too?
I do wonder how much the movie would have changed if it was a male protagonist. Would he fight Jamie Lee? I wonder how he would have approached the role.I’m really glad they did. I love Jackie Chan, but that movie would have just been yet another Jackie Chan movie instead of the outstanding film that it was was. And recasting Chan allowed them to bring in Quan, which reignited just how much we missed him from Hollywood.
It's worth noting that when they originally envisioned Jackie Chan in the role it was also like 2010. That movie simmered on the back burner a long time before it finally got going. It was originally about living with ADHD.Fun fact: Jackie Chan was originally intended to star in Everything Everywhere All at Once. But then The Daniels decided to gender flip the lead role and cast Michelle Yeoh instead.