Futureking said:
For the sake of argument, what will the government do about the downsized..ahem...*discharged* soldiers should the military budget be cut? Give them pensions/unemployment benefits?
There's re-training for other possible jobs. But firms aren't going to hire a person who was recently trained over another person with a few years of industry experience.
Edit: I'm not using this to justify maintaining the budget. I'm just saying the government better have a real plan for the newly discharged troops rather than just toss money at them and let them idle about.
Oh boy, you do NOT understand military budgets. First of all, as Krisken said, Obama is actually increasing the overall military budget. However, you could easily cut the military budget without laying off any soldiers. How? Much (most? I'm not sure the exact figure) of the budget goes to researching and building hardwear. A lot of money is wasted on hardwear that, quite frankly, the military doesn't need.
In Obama and Gate's budget, the Army and Marines will actually increase their total number of soldiers. The Navy and Airforce will not cut the number of their personel (as Bush had planned to do). Obama is stopping the production of F-22 fighter planes in 2011 (as discussed earlier) and killing the Navy's stealth ship program, but he's increasing the production of drone planes and close in land support ships. Basically, the details of any defense budget matter a whole lot; you can't just look at the topline number (although again, Obama is increasing that topline number).
Have you heard of the
Cybersecurity Act of 2009? It has been proposed by Sen. John Rockefeller and Sen. Olympia Snowe. This is a bill that would give the president the ability to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" and shut down or limit Internet traffic in any "critical" information network "in the interest of national security."
Yea, that's seems creepy. Hopefully it won't pass. I just don't see why the President would need that power
Oh, and on wiretapping? I'll repeat the same old argument. If you aren't doing something wrong or particularly suspicious, you have no real reason to fear.[/quote]