Gas Bandit's Political Thread III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Krisken said:
I'm still looking into that one. Do you have a link to the specifics involved in the proposed act?
Arstechnica has a link to the actual bill in their article. I didn't want to directly link it since they are hosting it. It's 50 pages long, but I think they use size 25 font. It's making me dizzy trying to read it.
 
Shakey said:
Krisken said:
I'm still looking into that one. Do you have a link to the specifics involved in the proposed act?
Arstechnica has a link to the actual bill in their article. I didn't want to directly link it since they are hosting it. It's 50 pages long, but I think they use size 25 font. It's making me dizzy trying to read it.
Thanks Shakey. Ugh, I don't know if I have time to read all this.

I don't trust the usual suspects (biased web sites) to give me the lowdown on what is actually in this. The Ars Technica article says part of it covers some private concerns regarded as critical infrastructure which can be turned off in response to a cyber attack. It's strange that they don't list turning off the internet if that is indeed proposed in the bill.
 
Krisken said:
Shakey said:
Krisken said:
I'm still looking into that one. Do you have a link to the specifics involved in the proposed act?
Arstechnica has a link to the actual bill in their article. I didn't want to directly link it since they are hosting it. It's 50 pages long, but I think they use size 25 font. It's making me dizzy trying to read it.
Thanks Shakey. Ugh, I don't know if I have time to read all this.

I don't trust the usual suspects (biased web sites) to give me the lowdown on what is actually in this. The Ars Technica article says part of it covers some private concerns regarded as critical infrastructure which can be turned off in response to a cyber attack. It's strange that they don't list turning off the internet if that is indeed proposed in the bill.
It looks like the main point of it is to be able to shutdown private businesses, like large banks and contractors working on stuff that may have confidential information. That doesn't mean that they couldn't say that the big ISP's that control backbone infrastructure are included. That would allow them to cut off large chunks of internet access.

The problem with this and with warrantless anything is that there are no checks and balances and we will most likely never know if it is being used properly. National security and all that.
 
Futureking said:
For the sake of argument, what will the government do about the downsized..ahem...*discharged* soldiers should the military budget be cut? Give them pensions/unemployment benefits?

There's re-training for other possible jobs. But firms aren't going to hire a person who was recently trained over another person with a few years of industry experience.

Edit: I'm not using this to justify maintaining the budget. I'm just saying the government better have a real plan for the newly discharged troops rather than just toss money at them and let them idle about.
Oh boy, you do NOT understand military budgets. First of all, as Krisken said, Obama is actually increasing the overall military budget. However, you could easily cut the military budget without laying off any soldiers. How? Much (most? I'm not sure the exact figure) of the budget goes to researching and building hardwear. A lot of money is wasted on hardwear that, quite frankly, the military doesn't need.

In Obama and Gate's budget, the Army and Marines will actually increase their total number of soldiers. The Navy and Airforce will not cut the number of their personel (as Bush had planned to do). Obama is stopping the production of F-22 fighter planes in 2011 (as discussed earlier) and killing the Navy's stealth ship program, but he's increasing the production of drone planes and close in land support ships. Basically, the details of any defense budget matter a whole lot; you can't just look at the topline number (although again, Obama is increasing that topline number).

Have you heard of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009? It has been proposed by Sen. John Rockefeller and Sen. Olympia Snowe. This is a bill that would give the president the ability to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" and shut down or limit Internet traffic in any "critical" information network "in the interest of national security."
Yea, that's seems creepy. Hopefully it won't pass. I just don't see why the President would need that power

Oh, and on wiretapping? I'll repeat the same old argument. If you aren't doing something wrong or particularly suspicious, you have no real reason to fear.[/quote]
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Which brings another gripe about the "emergency net shutoff" argument. What about the vonage customers who need to dial 911?
 
GasBandit said:
Which brings another gripe about the "emergency net shutoff" argument. What about the vonage customers who need to dial 911?
Well, the vonage customers who have DSL will be able to call anyway since the actual phone line will still be active.

Cable or FiOS folks are screwed though.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Al Sharpton has decided to call for Sheriff Arpaio's resignation.

Attorney General Eric Holder has his latest marching orders from the Senate: sue any states that aren't helping the needy register to vote.

Colorado is considering a bill that would create a single-payer healthcare plan. The bill would establish a 23-member commission that would design a universal health insurance system. The bill itself does not include funding for the authority, which means that it would have to rely on private donations in order to function. :facepalm:

A Chinese national is smuggling nuclear weapons materials to Iran from New York banks?

Reality hits the Obama Express.

What we learned from Obama's Spring Break

UN climate talks have stalled because richer countries can't agree to cut carbon emissions and poorer countries want more money.

Jonah Goldberg says that Obama's worst bailout thus far has been that of the United Nations Human Rights Council.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I don't find that story hard to believe. This is getting to be my catch phrase; "There's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat." Remember, the man responsible for the creation of the Welfare state was so Texan he still wore his cowboy hat as president.

You'll be happy to know that our own government can't tell you, the taxpayers, how much of the $700 billion bank bailout will be spent.

Victor Davis Hanson has his latest column on the politics of blame. Everyone in Washington is pointing fingers, and no one is responsible. Maybe you, the voters, are responsible because you elected these people.

New Air America host Montel Williams wants Newt Gingrich to "shut up" before he starts a nuclear war.

China is becoming the world's largest car market, surpassing the United States for the third month in a row.

You know times are tough when Nevada state legislatures call hookers to the state capitol to debate whether or not their profession should be taxed.

Government schools in Texas are considering an alternative grading system that would not dock grades for cheating or late assignments.

Take a look at what France is doing in order to combat Internet piracy. Coming soon to the United States?

What happens when a country decriminalizes drugs? Take a look at what happened in Portugal after five years.
 
Shakey said:
GasBandit said:
Take a look at what France is doing in order to combat Internet piracy. Coming soon to the United States?
Looks like they overestimated the support for the bill, it was shot down.
Now, now, don't underestimate our current congress. This kind of stupidity sounds right up their alley.
Did I read it right that it says that someone will simply look at download rates and such and decide whether or not they THINK you are downloading pirated material? That they won't even really know? Seriously? I must have misread that...
 
Apparently, F-22's should be used to stop pirates. I swear, this had me giggling.
FTA said:
It doesn't take an Air Force general to see how bizarre McInerney's military reasoning is. The analyst told Fox the F-22, at $146 million each, would be great against pirates due to its fast "reaction time" and 20 milimeter cannon.
Oh, and did I mention, the guy who said F22's should be used for this worked as a consultant for Northrop Grunman, a major contractor for F22's?
 
GasBandit said:
I don't find that story hard to believe. This is getting to be my catch phrase; "There's no bureaucrat like a Texas bureaucrat." Remember, the man responsible for the creation of the Welfare state was so Texan he still wore his cowboy hat as president.

Government schools in Texas are considering an alternative grading system that would not dock grades for cheating or late assignments.
First of all....oh Texas *sighs* But secondly, come on, we all know FDR started the welfare state, even if it was LBJ who greatly expanded it :p

Krisken said:
Apparently, F-22's should be used to stop pirates. I swear, this had me giggling.
FTA said:
It doesn't take an Air Force general to see how bizarre McInerney's military reasoning is. The analyst told Fox the F-22, at $146 million each, would be great against pirates due to its fast "reaction time" and 20 milimeter cannon.
Oh, and did I mention, the guy who said F22's should be used for this worked as a consultant for Northrop Grunman, a major contractor for F22's?
Wow. Just....wow. It's not like we're having a problem with the military might that these pirates have. When we find a pirate ship, they just surrender. The problem is not being able to tell which ships are used by the pirates until they've boarded civilian ships and therefore have hostages, in which case F-22s would be worse than useless.
 
Doesn't northrop get a piece of the f-35 anyway? Seeing as how gates expanded the program (which was always going to need more planes than the f-22), you'd think they'd have actually come out on top.
 
I

Iaculus

TeKeo said:
Doesn't northrop get a piece of the f-35 anyway? Seeing as how gates expanded the program (which was always going to need more planes than the f-22), you'd think they'd have actually come out on top.
So? This is just an opportunity to make more $.
 
Iaculus said:
TeKeo said:
Doesn't northrop get a piece of the f-35 anyway? Seeing as how gates expanded the program (which was always going to need more planes than the f-22), you'd think they'd have actually come out on top.
So? This is just an opportunity to make more $.
Gates has been talking about killing the program since at least February. If they were serious about continuing to make money off it, they'd have come up with a better argument by now than "it shoots pirates" and "OH NOES, THE RUSSKIES!"
 
I

Iaculus

TeKeo said:
Iaculus said:
TeKeo said:
Doesn't northrop get a piece of the f-35 anyway? Seeing as how gates expanded the program (which was always going to need more planes than the f-22), you'd think they'd have actually come out on top.
So? This is just an opportunity to make more $.
Gates has been talking about killing the program since at least February. If they were serious about continuing to make money off it, they'd have come up with a better argument by now than "it shoots pirates" and "OH NOES, THE RUSSKIES!"
I never said it was a good opportunity. They have to make aneffort, right?
 
Iaculus said:
TeKeo said:
Iaculus said:
TeKeo said:
Doesn't northrop get a piece of the f-35 anyway? Seeing as how gates expanded the program (which was always going to need more planes than the f-22), you'd think they'd have actually come out on top.
So? This is just an opportunity to make more $.
Gates has been talking about killing the program since at least February. If they were serious about continuing to make money off it, they'd have come up with a better argument by now than "it shoots pirates" and "OH NOES, THE RUSSKIES!"
I never said it was a good opportunity. They have to make aneffort, right?
True. Though they would have been better off with dire warnings about the Decepticons.
 
Espy said:
Shakey said:
GasBandit said:
Take a look at what France is doing in order to combat Internet piracy. Coming soon to the United States?
Looks like they overestimated the support for the bill, it was shot down.
Now, now, don't underestimate our current congress. This kind of stupidity sounds right up their alley.
Did I read it right that it says that someone will simply look at download rates and such and decide whether or not they THINK you are downloading pirated material? That they won't even really know? Seriously? I must have misread that...
They're basically doing what they are doing now. It's just the government would have a bigger role in it. Music/movie companies will hire outside companies to search for pirated movies, and report it to the government. They would then send it on to the ISP to either send out a warning or suspend them. The best part is this though:

HADOPI will also require that users secure their own networks (claiming that someone used your open WiFi router to download a file won't work), and plans to certify security software for use on home computers and networks. Such software, culture minister Christina Albanel confirmed this week, will be in constant contact with a central server in order to verify whether it is on or off at any particular moment.
Source

So basically everyone would have government issued security software that they keep constant track of.
 
Krisken said:
Texas representative thinks Chinese immigrants should change their names to be easier for Americans to pronounce.

Sorry for the left leaning site (I think it is, anyways, from the reading), but I'm having a very hard time finding the story on the more neutral sites. Apparently, they don't find it newsworthy.
This reminds me of a joke.

Bu, Chu, & Fu went from China to America to get jobs. Their boss decided to give them American names for the sake of pronunciation.

Bu was given the name Buck. Chu was given the name Chuck. And Fu was sent back to China.
 
Franken has won the latest court case for the Mn Senate seat, and is now ahead by 312 votes. That's more than he had before Coleman challenged him. Don't worry, Coleman says he'll challenge to the states supreme court. Looks like we'll be one senator short for a while longer.
 
Fidel Castro is asking to have the sanctions lifted after Obama had them loosened.

Is it time to play nice with Cuba? We openly trade with China, Russia and Vietnam. We even fought wars against them, even if for Russia by proxy.

I want real sugar in my Coke again...
 

sixpackshaker said:
Fidel Castro is asking to have the sanctions lifted after Obama had them loosened.

Is it time to play nice with Cuba? We openly trade with China, Russia and Vietnam. We even fought wars against them, even if for Russia by proxy.

I want real sugar in my Coke again...
We really can't say that we don't deal with Cuba only on the Human toll from the Castro regime. We deal with all sorts of bad people. This is an archaic leftover of the cold war.

Besides, a lot of what went on there with Castro was basically due to our bungling of such wonderful things as assassination attempts and cold war bullying. We helped keep Castro in power by being the common enemy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top