You wanna add a link so people know what you're talking about instead of making bumper sticker slogans?The Neon Grue said:GM: Government Motors..
Wasn't one of Obama's campaign promises to REDUCE big government, not INCREASE it?
You wanna add a link so people know what you're talking about instead of making bumper sticker slogans?The Neon Grue said:GM: Government Motors..
Wasn't one of Obama's campaign promises to REDUCE big government, not INCREASE it?
Aaah, so you're trolling. Gotcha.The Neon Grue said:No because that one's a pretty obvious blanket statement.
FTFYCovar said:NEWS
Covar, that doesn't say what he said.Covar said:
Why the fuck is OBAMA outlining plans for car companies?!Obama Outlines Plans for GM, Chrysler
I should hope not its a search result list.Krisken said:Covar, that doesn't say what he said.Covar said:
Because car companies are taking billions that belong to the everyday american taxpayers, firing taxpayers by the truckload and giving huge billionare bonuses to incopetent CEOs?The Neon Grue said:Why the fuck is OBAMA outlining plans for car companies?!
Because he's in charge of the Federal Government, which bought them (but called it a "bailout"). It's the same way that the federal government intimidates state government into enforcing things like 55mph highway speed limits, seat belt laws and the like by threatening to withhold federal highway money.The Neon Grue said:Why the fuck is OBAMA outlining plans for car companies?!
Thought that was an interesting article. Clearly, there's a line of how far Congress can go in giving the executive the power to shape Congresses laws. I did think it was funny that George Will doesn't actually give any reasons for TARP going over that line. Instead, he just calls it unconstitutional without backing that assertion up. *sigh*GasBandit said:George Will says that the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 is unconstitutional.
Anyone who read Krugman in the primaries? Seriously, the guy has never really liked Obama. Although the reason he doesn't like him is because Obama's policies are not leftist enough, which is probably not something you'd agree with, GasWho'dathunk that New York Times columnist Paul Krugman would turn out to be such a critic of the Obama administration's economic policies?
GasBandit said:In case you didn't know ... Barack Obama believes that North Dakota is experiencing flooding right now because of global warming.
Sounds to me like he's simply saying if we start to experience changes due to global warming it will make it even worse. Not that what's happening now is because of global warming."If you look at the flooding that's going on right now in North Dakota and you say to yourself, 'If you see an increase of two degrees, what does that do, in terms of the situation there?'" Obama told reporters at the White House Monday. "That indicates the degree to which we have to take this seriously."
Awww, come on. This thread wouldn't have any posts if it was absent of hyperbole.Shakey said:GasBandit said:In case you didn't know ... Barack Obama believes that North Dakota is experiencing flooding right now because of global warming.Sounds to me like he's simply saying if we start to experience changes due to global warming it will make it even worse. Not that what's happening now is because of global warming."If you look at the flooding that's going on right now in North Dakota and you say to yourself, 'If you see an increase of two degrees, what does that do, in terms of the situation there?'" Obama told reporters at the White House Monday. "That indicates the degree to which we have to take this seriously."
You are about 3 hours to early, at least with my clock, and that made me sad .Futureking said:Obama declares that he's opposed to the bonus tax which Congress is pushing for. However, Wall Street has to change it's ways. At least HE among the Democrats has the sense to think things clearly.
ThisKrisken said:Awww, come on. This thread wouldn't have any posts if it was absent of hyperbole.Shakey said:GasBandit said:In case you didn't know ... Barack Obama believes that North Dakota is experiencing flooding right now because of global warming.Sounds to me like he's simply saying if we start to experience changes due to global warming it will make it even worse. Not that what's happening now is because of global warming."If you look at the flooding that's going on right now in North Dakota and you say to yourself, 'If you see an increase of two degrees, what does that do, in terms of the situation there?'" Obama told reporters at the White House Monday. "That indicates the degree to which we have to take this seriously."
yes, but were talking about outright lying on a regular basis and then removing articles from their site when it's pointed out by someone.Iaculus said:Be fair - neither side is devoid of posturing and hyperbole. In fact, sometimes it almost seems like Dieb's the only constructive poster on here.
Were we? Thought JCM was commenting on the thread as a whole.Anubinomicon said:yes, but were talking about outright lying on a regular basis and then removing articles from their site when it's pointed out by someone.Iaculus said:Be fair - neither side is devoid of posturing and hyperbole. In fact, sometimes it almost seems like Dieb's the only constructive poster on here.
Funny, I thought he and Krisken were both saying that. It's not information, it's infotainment.Iaculus said:Were we? Thought JCM was commenting on the thread as a whole.Anubinomicon said:yes, but were talking about outright lying on a regular basis and then removing articles from their site when it's pointed out by someone.Iaculus said:Be fair - neither side is devoid of posturing and hyperbole. In fact, sometimes it almost seems like Dieb's the only constructive poster on here.
Awww, now you're making me blush :redface:Iaculus said:Be fair - neither side is devoid of posturing and hyperbole. In fact, sometimes it almost seems like Dieb's the only constructive poster on here.
I also like Penn, he's a very funny guy. And he usually has interesting views of the issues. I have to disagree with this article, though. Sure, if you want to point to one cause for this whole mess, "too much debt" would be the best thing to point too. But the problem wasn't that the government had taken on too much debt, it was that corporations and ordinary people had. And there's kinda a big difference between government debt and everybody else's debt.Penn Jillette on the economy and O's plan: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/01/ ... index.html
I love this guy so much. I like how he gives both sides when it's clear he's on one but acknowledges the potential that he may be wrong. Fun read either way.
This is so irritating. The guy was so obviously guilty, the justice department had to go out of their way to dumb-fucker it up. I swear to christ, what's the point of trying to hold people accountable for their actions if you can't follow the proper procedures?GasBandit said:
Weeeeellll.....in this specific case, I don't think Bush had anything to do with the bungling that went on. That would, indeed, require a tin foil hat. In the larger sense, however, the President does appoint the top officials at the Justice Department, and I think a case could be made that standards at Justice dropped under those officials due to who Bush appointed.Krisken said:To me, the Justice Department should be considered separate from the administration. While they certainly take direction from the White House, I can't fault Bush for the mistakes made by that department, any more than I could blame a mayor for a bumbling police department.
If I did, it would suggest, on purpose or accidentally, that Bush knew mistakes were being made.
I don't have a tin hat, you know!
With this I agree. Though, I'd have to say that about almost every Bush appointee.Dieb said:Weeeeellll.....in this specific case, I don't think Bush had anything to do with the bungling that went on. That would, indeed, require a tin foil hat. In the larger sense, however, the President does appoint the top officials at the Justice Department, and I think a case could be made that standards at Justice dropped under those officials due to who Bush appointed.Krisken said:To me, the Justice Department should be considered separate from the administration. While they certainly take direction from the White House, I can't fault Bush for the mistakes made by that department, any more than I could blame a mayor for a bumbling police department.
If I did, it would suggest, on purpose or accidentally, that Bush knew mistakes were being made.
I don't have a tin hat, you know!
These guys could do so much better. I want to respect them, I really do, but they make it so hard.Dieb said:Hey....I have some a link of my own for once! So, I assume everyone has heard of the House Republicans budget plan? The one they released last week that was only 17 some pages long and included no charts or graphs and very few numbers? Well, apparently they aren't willing to give up the farce even after the beating they took, so they've been trying to add some actual details to the plan. They've been failing at that, as well.
For example, under their budget the top marginal tax rates would be cut from 35% to 25%. But people could still voluntarily pay the higher tax rate (because everyone LOVES paying more taxes than they have to) And, it turns out, they actually assume for debt purposes (although under the plan the US would still be 500 billion dollars in the hole for the forseeable future) that EVERYONE pays the higher tax rate. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/0 ... 81779.html). Why would anyone listen to these idiots?
Exactly! I really, really want a vialble alternative to the Dems. I probably come off as pretty liberal on this board, but at heart I'm a contrarian. Someone needs to argue with Gas But in reality, I'm pretty much a moderate. I probably would have voted for Reagan, for example (I can't say for sure because I wasn't alive for either of his elections, so it's not like I know the all the issues from back then, etc etc). But as it is, it seems the Republicans do at least two things a day that just make me howl with laughter. Here's the second one for today: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... more-46361Krisken said:These guys could do so much better. I want to respect them, I really do, but they make it so hard.