HA! I love how Vanity Fair here bitches about the "the trivialization of the “news” by the media" while plastering the adds right next to this line with shiny screaming ads for LADY GAGA IN THE NEW ISSUE OF VANITY FAIR.:wtf:A day in the life of the president reveals that Obama's job would be almost unrecognizable to most of his predecessors--thanks to the enormous bureaucracy, congressional paralysis, systemic corruption and disintegrating media.
Oh please, you're just jealous. And ungrateful, too. I gave you a nice bagel and didn't even get a 'thank you' for it.Newsweek also said we flushed a Koran down the toilet at Gitmo. That wasn't true either
Oh please, you're just jealous. And ungrateful, too. I gave you a nice bagel and didn't even get a 'thank you' for it.[/QUOTE]Newsweek also said we flushed a Koran down the toilet at Gitmo. That wasn't true either
So one advisory panel to the FDA says "this drug might not be as effective as we previously thought" and this means death panels because of baseless speculation. Stop using the Telegraph as a source.Some say that this decision "marks the start of death panels" in the United States.
Because a federal agency always completely and truthfully states their reasoning and is beyond questioning, especially when recent legislation passed established controversial "cost effectiveness" measures as part of the review process, concerns for which are now coming to the surface.So one advisory panel to the FDA says "this drug might not be as effective as we previously thought" and this means death panels because of baseless speculation.
Stop thinking you're the first kid to read Marx and think they've got everything figured out for everyone. Tada!Stop using the Telegraph as a source.
Well that was a serious brain fart, now wasn't it /facepalm.Gas, that's the Guardian, you linked the Telegraph.
Well that was a serious brain fart, now wasn't it /facepalm.[/QUOTE]Gas, that's the Guardian, you linked the Telegraph.
What have they gotten wrong, apart from 4 or 5 premature obituaries over the last hundred years?But they are so reliable.
Not exactly a history of neutrality, no matter which political leaning they have.Wikipedia said:The Daily Telegraph has been politically conservative in modern times.[23] The personal links between the paper's editors and the leadership of the Conservative Party, along with the paper's influence over Conservative activists, has resulted in the paper commonly being referred to, especially in Private Eye, as the Torygraph.[23] However, in its early years it was associated with William Gladstone and the Liberal party, coining the nickname "the people's William"
I asked what they got wrong. Bias doesn't always mean uniform factual inaccuracy, not even in the case of CNN and MSNBC. "They're Conservative" isn't exactly up to snuff.Not exactly a history of neutrality, no matter which political leaning they have.
[MP3]http://gasbanditry.com/mymusic/oh-you%27re-no-fun-anymore.mp3[/MP3]You're right, I got nothing on this, except that particular article is mired in fail. Shame, too, since generally the paper isn't so... weak sauce.
(Hah, bet you didn't think I'd say you were right, didja?)
This one just seems nonsensical. I understand that getting the majority of our forces out is good, but it seems rather early to celebrate the affair as "over". How long did it take us to get those military bases out of Germany, again?And of course, Mission Accomplished II: Iraqi Boogaloo. How are we "out of Iraq" when we still have 50,000 troops there? Non-combat my ass. Last I heard, Docseverin was still there.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38744453/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa?obamaasfighterjetpilot
What.The Justice Department is turning up the heat in its ongoing investigation into alleged civil rights violations by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Maybe they should use some of that energy on the illegals breaking the law or the sanctuary cities failing to enforce it.
What.The Justice Department is turning up the heat in its ongoing investigation into alleged civil rights violations by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Maybe they should use some of that energy on the illegals breaking the law or the sanctuary cities failing to enforce it.
Damn it. I'm about to do something I hate doing. Here it goes....I think the position that Gas usually takes on Arpaio is that he's wildly popular in his own community, lawfully elected and actually does the job he says he will do. For some reason, this makes it alright that Arpaio is horribly corrupt and uses Gestapo tactics to ensure his own political agenda is always fulfilled.
What.The Justice Department is turning up the heat in its ongoing investigation into alleged civil rights violations by Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Maybe they should use some of that energy on the illegals breaking the law or the sanctuary cities failing to enforce it.
Repeal them when they are found unconstitutional at Trial, which they very likely will. The popularity of a sentiment has no bearing on the legality of them, Gas. If it did, Jim Crowe would still be in effect.Almost half of the states in this country are considering laws very similar to the Arizona immigration law. What will Obama do then?
Repeal them when they are found unconstitutional at Trial, which they very likely will. The popularity of a sentiment has no bearing on the legality of them, Gas. If it did, Jim Crowe would still be in effect.[/QUOTE]Almost half of the states in this country are considering laws very similar to the Arizona immigration law. What will Obama do then?
Repeal them when they are found unconstitutional at Trial, which they very likely will. The popularity of a sentiment has no bearing on the legality of them, Gas. If it did, Jim Crowe would still be in effect.[/QUOTE]Almost half of the states in this country are considering laws very similar to the Arizona immigration law. What will Obama do then?