So yeah, I enjoyed it. I'm not sure what change tegid and Far are thinking of, but reading the storyline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremis_(comics) shows there are many changes from the comic.
considering they cast a white English actor to play the racist Chinese super villain, I thought the change was brilliant. It was also setup well throughout the movie.
I liked Iron Man 2Why the fuck can Marvel not make a good Iron Man movie after the first one? Almost everything in this movie screamed "plot device"...
/nerdrage.
I liked Iron Man 2
Yep, my nitpick is:
Other than that, I was perfectly fine with the change. It worked well.The ten rings terrorist organization already existed in the first movie. Was it created by AIM? Was it taken over by them? Or is it a plot hole?
None of the above. I didn't see anything connecting the Mandarin with the Ten Rings. They seem to be, in this universe, unrelated.
I completely disagree.Why the fuck can Marvel not make a good Iron Man movie after the first one? Almost everything in this movie screamed "plot device"...
/nerdrage.
I could swear the logo was there on the videosNone of the above. I didn't see anything connecting the Mandarin with the Ten Rings. They seem to be, in this universe, unrelated.
He's pretty Indian too.considering they cast a white English actor to play the racist Chinese super villain, I thought the change was brilliant. It was also setup well throughout the movie.
Looking at screenshots, you're right, I remembered seeing the swords part, but not the rest of it. In that case:I could swear the logo was there on the videos
Or AIM has been at this since 1999. <-- far simpler explanation
-While I really enjoyed the final sequence, I wasn't crazy about the fact that the majority of it, Tony spent it outside of the armour(s). It's not Tony Stark 3, but Iron Man 3. Then again, we got PLENTY of armour action, so it's a minor complaint at best. The lack of a suit certainly added plenty of tension.
The one major flaw that everyone pointed out that I agree with.
with a terrorist organization threatening the US government, SHIELD is nowhere to be seen? Isn't this stuff exactly their job?
Fiege (Feige?) mentioned in an interview that the absence would be a part of the plot in avengers 2. But I gotta look up the article. He said something along the lines of "Tony wouldn't forget about that"The one major flaw that everyone pointed out that I agree with.
with a terrorist organization threatening the US government, SHIELD is nowhere to be seen? Isn't this stuff exactly their job?
Holy shit, why didn't I think of that? I doubt that was intentional (if it was, it would've been mentioned), but some really nice synchronicity there. I take back what I said.
- I didn't mind him being out of the suit so much, it was kind of an answer to that Cap line from Avengers "Take away the suit and what are you?"
I also really liked the contrast to how skilled Rhodes was out of the suit compared to Tony.Holy shit, why didn't I think of that? I doubt that was intentional (if it was, it would've been mentioned), but some really nice synchronicity there. I take back what I said.
Now we get Captain America #2, which is just Cap n' SHIELD FRIENDS <3If I wanted to watch a movie about SHIELD I'd watch Iron Man 2.
If I wanted to watch a movie about SHIELD I'd watch Iron Man 2.