[Other] The not so funny pic thread (some NSFL or gore)

One of the most heartbr/achingly bittersweet images I have ever seen on Reddit. I doubt it will ever leave the top ten, possibly the top five such images I see in my lifetime.

qhrYU.jpg


--Patrick
 
I am not a fan of sunshine and happiness through suicide.
I totally get this. I think it's worth asking though, that in a case like this picture isn't it less of a "suicide will make things better" statement and more of a "this is the perception of this person"? I mean, that seems like an important thing, and certainly one worth considering.
 
I don't care, it is a terribly skewed point of view.
Look, I don't want to get into a huge argument here, but what you said is exactly the point and I would argue, exactly why you should care.

I want to be clear, I am not advocating for the glorification of suicide as a way out. Merely that the view of those who are tempted to commit the act shouldn't be marginalized.
 
I am marginalizing the art. It angers me on a personal level.
I am with Espy on this one. I see the picture not as a pop-up ad trying to convince me of the tidiness of an easy solution to all of Life's problems, but instead as a window to how the option of suicide might appear/appeal to someone once they become really, truly desperate.

However, my sympathy for the artist's point of view does not mean I don't still get the urge to choke a random stranger on the Internet if their sole contribution to a discussion is to post OMFG U R SUCH A <twit> DRINK SOME BLEACH U NEED 2 DIE :troll: in response to when someone is obviously despondent and is making what might be a last-ditch plea for help on the Internet*.

--Patrick
*Not the best place for a last-ditch plea, but by then they're not generally rational.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Isn't that why there are pages and pages of youtube vids full of people getting kicked in the nuts, or falling on their nuts, or hitting their nuts on things? Because it's art?
No, I don't mean kicking "somebody" in the nuts, I mean actually kicking you, the art consumer, in the nuts. Like, if a guy just stood in a museum on a 4 inch pedestal, holding a sign that says "ART" on it, and any time someone stopped to look at him, he'd kick them in the crotch.

Huh... actually....
 
Well, we've got people who dance in butter, I don't see why we couldn't have someone who, as a performance piece, kicks his audience in the nuts. Might put congress out of a job, tho.
 
Interactive performance art?
I would build an animatronic Mr. Peanut sitting in a wingback chair. You would stand right on the two footprints and press a button, and he would stand up and deliver a compressed-air-assisted boot to your groin. The exhibit would be titled "Assaulted Nuts."

You're welcome.

Edit: DANGIT, Gared !

--Patrick
 
Interactive performance art?
I would build an animatronic Mr. Peanut sitting in a wingback chair. You would stand right on the two footprints and press a button, and he would stand up and deliver a compressed-air-assisted boot to your groin. The exhibit would be titled "Assaulted Nuts."

You're welcome.

Edit: DANGIT, Gared !

--Patrick
I dunno, if I were going to go the animatronic route, I think I'd go with the entire cast of the Country Bear Jamboree, or a bunch of the random pirates from the Pirates of the Caribbean ride or something.
 
I dunno, if I were going to go the animatronic route, I think I'd go with the entire cast of the Country Bear Jamboree, or a bunch of the random pirates from the Pirates of the Caribbean ride or something.
That would be for the "Gauntlet" exhibit.

--Patrick
 
A lot of art is there to express an idea. So, yes, a museum display that kicks you in the nuts, to demonstrate the idea of "art makes you feel," is very much art.
 
Top