Epic Games [argues] that Apple does not compete with anyone; it is a monopoly of one. Apple, by contrast, argues that the effective area of competition is the market for all digital video games[, and] that it does not enjoy monopoly power [there], and therefore does not violate federal and state law.
The Court disagrees with both parties’ definition of the relevant market.
[A]fter evaluating the trial evidence, the Court finds that the relevant market here is digital mobile gaming transactions, not gaming generally and not Apple’s own internal operating systems related to the App Store.