It's back up. People were a little quick to jump on this as YouTube being some kind of monster.So youtube has apparently terminated the youtube account of the Angry Video Game Nerd.
It's back up. People were a little quick to jump on this as YouTube being some kind of monster.So youtube has apparently terminated the youtube account of the Angry Video Game Nerd.
They are more than a little gun shy now that Sega has been taking down ANY video that mentions Shining Force 2. Like, not even just the lets plays and reviews. ANY video that so much as mentions it.It's back up. People were a little quick to jump on this as YouTube being some kind of monster.
They're claiming 5 - 10 hours of gaming and 24 hours of HD video playback.By the way, has anyone heard anything about the battery life for Project Shield? Gaming-quality components tend to be power hungry.
I find that very difficult to believe.They're claiming 5 - 10 hours of gaming and 24 hours of HD video playback.
Well... I guess that's not too bad, assuming the numbers are correct. But like Poe, I'm skeptical.They're claiming 5 - 10 hours of gaming and 24 hours of HD video playback.
In case anyone hasn't been following the news on this, it's not the Steam console prototype. It's Valve endorsed hardware, but it's not the Steam Box that Valve will be selling.
Which make sense since HD TVs cost less than going to the movies nowdays....My biggest problem with consoles today is their inability to display games at a non-HD definition. This has made many of my games frustratingly difficult to play because I am utterly unable to make heads or tails of the tiny, illegible text that they use. It's like developers suddenly decided 5+ years ago that everyone must have an HDtv by now.
They didn't when the 360 came out. The only reason they are cheap now is because they are trying to push 3D TV but no one is buying them.Which make sense since HDTVs cost less than going to the movies nowdays....
I am less annoyed by the pushing of gaming at HD resolutions, and more annoyed by the inability of developers to properly optimize their games so they run at a consistent framerate at HD-ish resolutions. I don't care if a game actually runs in 720p vs 1080p if it stays steady at 50-60fps. But if it runs in 1080p but bounces up and down between 15-50, y'all really needed to either bring it down to 720p or fix some shit or both.They didn't when the 360 came out. The only reason they are cheap now is because they are trying to push 3D TV but no one is buying them.
My main problem is that I still play a lot of my classic games on original systems. However, running an old school console on an HDTV turns games that WOULD have looked good at the time into something ugly. This is because developers didn't fathom at time when a TV would be running in 1080p and didn't design for it in mind. You tried running an NES on a HDTV? It does not look the same as it does on a SD, and that's not even getting into the fact you can't use a light gun on an HDTV.
I don't. But it's one of the reasons I haven't gone HD; I play my PS2, SNES, and other consoles FAR more than I play my 360, so I want those games to look right. However, its not unreasonable for developers to support a format that is still in production and still populates a large number of homes.I don't have unrealistic expectations like you to run 80ies tech onto TVs built in in the new millennium.
Fuck the haters, this looks cool.If you thought Project Shield was gimmicky... I present to you: Microsoft's IllumiRoom
Yeah, I found that, but I only see it being available in the UK/Australia. Everything I've read says the US version is a different special edition. Either way, there's a ton of articles, so I guess the statue is doing its job.Google Image Search turns up another version as well of the same zombie bait bust that is wearing an american flag bikini instead of union jack...