Eh, I think that's just more of a "wat" face. They just had their micro-expressions at the exact moment the pic was taken.Oh boy, can't wait to see why Hazel is so "hilariously" stunted as to be discomfited at her friends' pregnancy.
I will be very surprised if the next couple strips don't involve Hazel adamantly refusing mature.Eh, I think that's just more of a "wat" face. They just had their micro-expressions at the exact moment the pic was taken.
Yeah that does seem likely.I will be very surprised if the next couple strips don't involve Hazel adamantly refusing mature.
Well, it wasn't exactly how I envisioned it, but Hazel sure knows how to get acerbic about a grammatical technicality on a well-known turn of phrase when everybody (including her) already knows good and well what it means and is happy for their friend... which is pretty immature and assholish.I will be very surprised if the next couple strips don't involve Hazel adamantly refusing mature.
I'm still waiting for more backstory. He's a little polite to be a stereotypical arch-villain.The latest GrrlPower is great and its a comic that NEEDED to be done.
Agreed, I'm betting he's pretty old too considering he has clear knowledge of magic and what-not. Of course I'm not sure if the comic stated exactly when supers started showing up, so its anyone's guess.I'm still waiting for more backstory. He's a little polite to be a stereotypical arch-villain.
--Patrick
It's Hazel. She's a term that our forum censors.Well, it wasn't exactly how I envisioned it, but Hazel sure knows how to get acerbic about a grammatical technicality on a well-known turn of phrase when everybody (including her) already knows good and well what it means and is happy for their friend... which is pretty immature and assholish.
See you next tuesday.It's Hazel. She's a term that our forum censors.
Not disagreeting with your assessment, but considering how long she had a thing for Jameson and never liked the Maureen/Jameson pairing, their having a kid moves him one step closer to never being available again. It's completely selfish but not out of character.Well, it wasn't exactly how I envisioned it, but Hazel sure knows how to get acerbic about a grammatical technicality on a well-known turn of phrase when everybody (including her) already knows good and well what it means and is happy for their friend... which is pretty immature and assholish.
Seems like a petty way to express that, but as you said, not particularly out of character.Not disagreeting with your assessment, but considering how long she had a thing for Jameson and never liked the Maureen/Jameson pairing, their having a kid moves him one step closer to never being available again. It's completely selfish but not out of character.
It's still no K&K.So. Huh. Sandra and Woo. The comic's gotten a little edgy from time to time (a comic whose principal characters are all roughly 12 years old, but still makes the occasional sex/boner joke)... but I think their latest one trumps all the previous ones. Nothing like drawing a barely censored pair of screwing raccoons (complete with ahe gao facial expression) on the thanksgiving table spread while horrified humans look on.
Yeah, Kevin and Kell are just doing it ALL the time. Unlike Kit and Kayboodle which is just good Christian values.It's still no K&K.
--Patrick
Hey, I was proud of that double entendre.Yeah, Kevin and Kell are just doing it ALL the time. Unlike Kit and Kayboodle which is just good Christian values.
Also, the current thing in Broodhollow is a dream right? It has to be a dream.
I doubt it. It seems to go along with the running "no one in town realizes/remembers that something is really weird" theme.
No! He demands to be scared (His last words in the dream are "scare me"). I think it is unlikely that this is a dream.