I must know what movie that's from.Complimentary Emma Watson dancing GIF
I must know what movie that's from.Complimentary Emma Watson dancing GIF
The Bling Ring apparently.I must know what movie that's from.
Oh man, did you guys see this transformers trailer?
Welp, Cheesy had no such compunctions.I feel I should appropriately rate that, but it would spoil said spoiler.
Sorry, I rated that before I saw the other posts. Oopsie.Welp, Cheesy had no such compunctions.
From the article:This isn't a trailer, but I didn't know where else to put it.
No . . . just no!
'It's a Wonderful Life' Sequel Coming in 2015
I wonder if they realize this has been the punchline of parodies.an angel who shows George Bailey's grandson (also named George Bailey) how much better off the world would have been had he never been born.
Gremlins 2 was by the same director though, and was essentially his "fuck you" to studios that mandate sequels.It sounds kinda like one of those parody sequels like Gremlins 2, or Texas Chainsaw Massacre two. However while both those films were made not long after the originals, this one will be made SIXTY SEVEN FREAKIN' YEARS LATER!
I think it's a damn shame that hollywood relies so much on CGI to bring us amazing creatures. It's like it's a chore for them to create something absolutely amazing. Well here's news to you, Hollywood. Jim Henson made two damn freakingly beautiful movies where pretty much everything in them were puppets and practical effects. I can sit my kids down to watch Dark Crystal and tell them "This is how you prove to the world you really cared about your movie."Agreed, the world needs more freaking puppets in theaters dammit! The muppets can only sate this one so much.
Last few years = since the mid-90s. A few years ago Joe Dante was officially off the potential director list because he refused to go CGI on the Gremlins. Despite that, the project hasn't moved from development hell and maybe never will.I love both Gremlins movies equally, but for totally different reasons. The first, in terms of story and overall quality, I'd say is better. The second is just totally, off-the-wall bonkers in every imaginable way. And I LOVE it.[DOUBLEPOST=1384914925,1384914874][/DOUBLEPOST]Also, there's been talk of a new Gremlins movie in the last few years. If it gets made, they better stick with practical goddamn effects. No CGI bull, unless it's to enhance the practical effects.
Sadly I don't think that anyone would ever allow what Jim Henson did with the first to ever happen again. I think I heard it would be a CGI film, and to that I say "why bother?" The first was beautiful and took amazing effort to not only get amazing creatures and locations in it, but to figure out how to actually accomplish it. CGI they only ever have to worry about the first part nowadays.Speaking of development hell, anyone else worried about the Dark Crystal sequel? Thats been passed off to numerous directors over the years, if it DOES come out of hiatus I worry about its quality.
They nixed that project in February 2012.Speaking of development hell, anyone else worried about the Dark Crystal sequel? Thats been passed off to numerous directors over the years, if it DOES come out of hiatus I worry about its quality.
Wow I thought he nailed it to a tee. When the 2001 movie came out, I was like, "see?!? See people?!? That's what you've been missing when you poo poo comics!!"[DOUBLEPOST=1386256659,1386256621][/DOUBLEPOST]Assuming of course 3 never happened.I thought he was more believable as Peter Parker than Toby McGuire was, at least. But then, I didn't like McGuire.
That's because Toby McGuire has less range than a potato. In Seabicuit the horse showed more emotion. It really doesn't help that the Rami movies themselves weren't that great either.I thought he was more believable as Peter Parker than Toby McGuire was, at least. But then, I didn't like McGuire.