Nah, going that far is silly.The olympics should always be in the US. We're the only country that can handle it.
It was one of the best ones in my memory. It is just the nation went to hell a few years later.[DOUBLEPOST=1392936972,1392936937][/DOUBLEPOST]
Or America, no bombings here, oh wait...Nah, going that far is silly.
NATO countries. That's probably the safest bet.
I think the true litmus test should be, nations with plumbing that can handle toilet tissue.Or America, no bombings here, oh wait...
No, THIS should be the ultimate betting chip for the men's U.S. Vs. Canada game:
Zing!8-2 after six ends.
Who're they playing, the US Women?
Huh. I thought US/Canada WAS the gold medal match.Sweden in the gold medal match vs winner Canada/USA, Finland plays for Bronze.
That's was for the Women's medal game, this is the Men's division.Huh. I thought US/Canada WAS the gold medal match.
I know, but the hype has been enormous for this. So I thought it was the final.That's was for the Women's medal game, this is the Men's division.
Hype has been huge because this should have been the gold medal matchup. Olympic organizers purposely put USA and Canada in the same bracket to hopefully eliminate one of them, instead it has all the excitement for the semifinal.I know, but the hype has been enormous for this. So I thought it was the final.
Yeah the gold medal match won't have near this much hope add the clear winner will be USA or Canada unless there is an underdog story in the makingHype has been huge because this should have been the gold medal matchup. Olympic organizers purposely put USA and Canada in the same bracket to hopefully eliminate one of them, instead it has all the excitement for the semifinal.
underdog story nothing. Sweden was the projected favourite by many heading in to thw tournament.Yeah the gold medal match won't have near this much hope add the clear winner will be USA or Canada unless there is an underdog story in the making
No, THIS should be the ultimate betting chip for the men's U.S. Vs. Canada game:
View attachment 13976