Coronavirus Thread

Dave

Staff member
Again, Nebraska shows as decreasing, but you can't get tested. They SAY you can get tested but you have to have symptoms or too fucking bad. And antibodies test to find out if you have had ti in the past? Guffaw. No, we don't do that here.

We've done NOTHING to curb the spread. Well, we did at first, but that changed quickly.
 
And antibodies test to find out if you have had ti in the past? Guffaw. No, we don't do that here.
That's surprising. There are tons of labs testing here and it's covered by insurance. They have a vested interest in getting samples of blood with the antibodies so I would've thought this would be everywhere.
 
Again, Nebraska shows as decreasing, but you can't get tested. They SAY you can get tested but you have to have symptoms or too fucking bad. And antibodies test to find out if you have had ti in the past? Guffaw. No, we don't do that here.

We've done NOTHING to curb the spread. Well, we did at first, but that changed quickly.
I'm just sitting here in Colorado, hoping maybe we can build a wall around it to keep the rest of the Midwest out.
 
I'm just sitting here in Colorado, hoping maybe we can build a wall around it to keep the rest of the Midwest out.
You'd better keep the Oregonians out as well. We're doing fuck-all in terms of testing in most of our counties. I ranted about what I went through trying to get a test last month - couldn't get tested even though I had all of the symptoms because I didn't personally know one of the existing positively testing individuals, couldn't get the antibody test because I was symptomatic, couldn't get the rapidscan test because our county is only using that for people who are already admitted to the ICU, can't get admitted to the ICU unless you are currently dying. I wasn't admitted to the hospital, which was the other testing criteria - it wasn't enough that I had a persistent high fever, cough, lung pain, dizziness, etc. The main hospital that's conducting testing refuses to do any testing because they they'll run out of tests, and they refuse to wear PPE because they'll run out of PPE if they do that.

Meanwhile, we have community members who have threatened - on social media which was then deleted by the original poster, our town's mayor - to shoot people in the back if they see them on the streets wearing masks, because "mask wearers have drunk the democratic kool-aid, and don't deserve rights, because they're too cowardly, and need to be shot in the back, until dead." First - what kind of a coward shoots another man in the back? Second - what kind of an asshole shoots someone else for wearing a mask? Oh, and the wife of the dude that made the threat? She's constantly posting to her Facebook page about how this is all a hoax, and the doctors are lying about how serious it is to control our minds and keep us pacified. Instead, people should be out celebrating all of the good that God has given us, and make sure you're going to large gatherings with your family members and especially your grandparents - they need all of the love and contact they can get right now. Oh, and she's the director of patient wellness at a local nursing home. Yeah...
 
That's why we had to stay home for 10 days anyways after I was tested due to exposure back in May. The swab came back negative, but you still don't know if you've got it unless you show symptoms.


...oh, did I mention that I was exposed to someone who tested positive for COVID at my summer workplace, back around Memorial Day weekend? And I didn't get paid at all for the days I was off?
 
...oh, did I mention that I was exposed to someone who tested positive for COVID at my summer workplace, back around Memorial Day weekend? And I didn't get paid at all for the days I was off?
If you get sick, it's your own fault for not being vaccinated with enough money when you were born.

--Patrick
 
Last edited:
I have had to basically turn my back on one of my social groups because they aren't being safe at all. This county has not been hit particularly hard, but the next county over has more cases than 8 states, and it is only the fifth highest total in the state.
 
Can't read due to GDPR. But i'm going to guess it's nothing good.
LINCOLN — At his regular coronavirus press conferences, Gov. Pete Ricketts makes a point of urging Nebraskans to wear a mask when they go to a store.
But when it comes to the state’s 93 courthouses and other local government offices, he doesn’t want local officials to require masks. In fact, he’s told local governments that they won’t receive any of the $100 million in federal COVID-19 money if their “customers” are required to wear masks.

“The governor encourages people to wear a mask,” according to his spokesman Taylor Gage, “but does not believe that failure to wear a mask should be the basis for denying taxpayers’ services.”
The no-mask mandate has been poorly received in some corners of the state, with officials criticizing the loss of local control. It also runs counter to the advice of public health officials, who have stressed the importance of wearing masks.
In Lincoln, the state’s second-largest city, officials were preparing to require all visitors to wear masks when entering the City-County Building. But the draft rules were promptly dropped when officials were informed that Lancaster County wouldn’t receive CARES Act money if it instituted a mask requirement.
Deb Schorr, a longtime Lancaster County Board member and past president of the Nebraska Association of County Officials, said county officials “love local control” and are better informed about conditions in their county, particularly concerning COVID-19. The virus has hammered several parts of Nebraska, even as 18 rural counties have not recorded a single positive case.

But with millions of dollars at stake, local officials said they had little choice but to comply with the governor’s order. Otherwise, they’d have to find local options for replacing the federal money, such as higher property taxes.

“We’d like to have a little bit more ability to call the shots in our courthouse, but we realize that he has the right to set the rules,” Schorr said.
An official in Dakota County was more blunt.
Dakota County Assessor Jeff Curry said he was hoping that a mask requirement could be remain in place for the courthouse through July 1. The northeast Nebraska county, home to a Tyson meatpacking plant, has been one of the hardest-hit counties in the nation for COVID-19. Visitors to the courthouse were not only required to wear a mask when entering, but their temperatures also were checked and they were asked a series of questions about coronavirus exposure.
Those health precautions, however, went out the window as of Monday, the date that Ricketts directed government offices to reopen to the public.
Curry said the message from the governor is “you better do what I want you to do.”
“It sure would have been nice to be able to sit down with our health director and County Board and have a conversation about what to do, without being mandated to do it,” he said.

The issue first arose late last month when Ricketts issued a guidance document to counties and other local governments, advising that if they wanted any of the CARES Act money that was allocated to the state, their offices needed to reopen to the public by June 15.

Of the $2 trillion in spending Congress authorized in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Nebraska received about $1 billion to help offset coronavirus-related costs for states and local governments. A total of $100 million was set aside for counties, cities and utilities, with the governor in charge of doling out the money.
The only exception is Douglas County, which received $166 million to distribute to local entities in the county. The City of Omaha could be eligible to receive a share of both the county and state money.
Ricketts’ CARES Act guidance indicated that counties, cities and utility districts could set social distancing standards and control access to their buildings, but added: “Customers may be encouraged to wear face coverings, but may not be refused service for failure to do so.”
At a press conference Monday, in answering a question from a Dakota County reporter, Ricketts made it clear that if Dakota County officials didn’t want to adhere to the mask guidance, they could go without CARES Act money.
“Counties are not prohibited from requiring masks, but if they want CARES Act money, they have to be fully open, and that means they cannot deny service for not wearing a mask,” said Gage, the governor’s spokesman.

On Monday, a trio of physicians on the faculty at the University of Nebraska Medical Center — which has served as an adviser to Ricketts for his COVID-19 response — published a guest opinion piece in The World-Herald urging Nebraskans to wear masks in public places to avoid another surge in infections.
Schorr, the Lancaster County Board member, pointed out that Ricketts gave the State Supreme Court the option to require masks in courtrooms statewide. That, she said, presents a “challenge” for the Lancaster County Hall of Justice, which has courtrooms on the top three floors and other county offices on the first floor.
In Dakota County, visitors can now enter the courthouse mask-free. But Curry said the county instituted new limits on the number of people who can enter the courthouse. That has led to long lines of patrons waiting outside in the hot sun, he said, prompting the county this week to buy shade tents and hand out bottles of water to those in line.
 
Can't read due to GDPR. But i'm going to guess it's nothing good.
Basically the same thing happening in a lot of states. Local governments want to require masks in public during the outbreak, but Governors are refusing to allow it. The Governor of Nebraska basically threatened to cut any federal COVID relief money to any local government that enforces such a requirement. We had the same thing here in Texas.

I still don't really understand it. We are required to wear clothing in public as a matter of public decency. We are required to wear a seat belt while riding in a car for our own protection. We are required to do a whole lot of things for the safety or care for ourselves or those around us. Why is requiring a mask for the time being a bridge too far for so many people?
 

Dave

Staff member
You also have to remember that Ricketts is involved with Trump's campaign. In fact, governor Pete Ricketts' brother is Trump's campaign fund-raising manager.
 
Canada is getting a tracking app. Basically it remembers anyone else who has the app for the last two weeks and if anyone tests positive it tells you that you were exposed.
 
Last edited:
Once again, I would like to take our state which is heavily encouraging mask wearing, and build a wall around it. :p
 
Ducey is foisting it back on the local governments.

Thankfully, my city mayor has enough sense to decree masks in public UFN.
 
This county just posted its highest one day increase. It looks like the daily growth rate has been averaging roughly 4% for the last week.
 
I just came back from getting antacid at our local Walgreen's (we've been going through more of it than usual lately for some reason).
The pharmacist's assistant was going about her business with her mask down below her nose.
Also there was a sign taped to the front door that they are currently hiring a pharmacist's assistant.
I wonder if the two are related.

--Patrick
 
Our church wisely canceled its decision to (for the first time since March) have in-person services on Sunday.

Meanwhile, 12 of the last 14 days have been 1K or more new cases, and the last two days have been 2K each.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
I was in Bellville today (a little town west of Houston), nobody there was wearing masks but myself and my AV coworkers.

But I went to the grocery store here back at home after I returned and got off work, and I'd say at least 80% of the people I saw there were wearing masks (and only 2 people out of all that were wearing them incorrectly)... so... I guess mileage varies.
 
Our governor has started making masks mandatory in individual counties, but since our county refuses to test, we're probably never going to see an order. As far as the county is concerned, we've just now had our first new case in almost a week, and that was someone who just got back from an RV tour of several states. Meanwhile, we had a community case that wasn't tied to any others, but that was totally a one-off, complete outlier, can't possibly happen again. Except for that case that sprung up in one of the hospitals, where said patient had been a patient while they contracted the disease, so they must have been infected by someone who works at the hospital, but that's a complete outlier, would never happen again in a million years, no reason to test for this silly democratic bullshit. Remember, doctors lie.
 
Top