No thought for kangaroos who might be conscientious objectors?This is assuming all 48 million kangaroos participate in front-line action though. Some of them might be logistics kangaroos. Some of them might be officers who sit in command rooms and give orders. Some of them might just pilot the landing craft. Some of them might be administrative kangaroos in a typing pool. Until we know the specific makup of the kangaroo invasion force, we cannot say that each Uruguayan would have to fight 14 kangaroos.
I'll believe it when I see it.No thought for kangaroos who might be conscientious objectors?
<That's Racist.gif>I'll believe it when I see it.
Ain't nobody square up quicker than a 'roo.
No it's not... it's Specieism... duh.<That's Racist.gif>
Hah what was I thinking...it's already been on Tumblr.Also I expect this will sweep through Tumblr like a fire in dry grass.
To wit:Hah what was I thinking...it's already been on Tumblr.
I gotta say, that's totally rad.
--Patrick
To wit:
EDIT: As someone else pointed out on reddit, note the lack of STD's.
You know, call me crazy, but I'm starting to think some gamers are morons who don't understand what "politics" means.
The "keep politics out of gaming" crowd just keep getting stupider.
Politics is when a game has a woman or not-white person in it. Or heaven forbid, a gay.You know, call me crazy, but I'm starting to think some gamers are morons who don't understand what "politics" means.
Politics is when a game has a woman or not-white person in it. Or heaven forbid, a gay.
Yet, when it's white dudebros shooting things up with US Army weapons, which actually does funnel quite a lot of money into games to appeal to young men, which means there's an actual financial mastodont pushing their agenda, they'renowhere to be heard.
To be fair, there totally can be "queer content" or "trans content" which is forced. If it wasn't forced, it would just be "content."
Except the ones who rally against ANY inclusion call it forced whether it is or not. And that's the point I was making.To be fair, there totally can be "queer content" or "trans content" which is forced. If it wasn't forced, it would just be "content."
Does it come across like an ABC After-School Special PSA, and do they refer to "the gay guy" every 5 minutes? Yeah, that's fhorced. Does a dude just happen to have a picture of another dude on his office desk? Not forced.
--Patrick
Oh, most certainly. But these ARIs were going to do that anyway, because Heaven forbid that any of that stuff become widely accepted.Except the ones who rally against ANY inclusion call it forced whether it is or not.
ArchAngela Doesn't Care about your logic.And God promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.