South Africa 2010

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Biardo

2-0 bye Italy,

That goal, I don't know, you can't see it clearly on the replays so maybe
 
B

Biardo

maybe...

but Italy has to score again, they have only 2 points and Slovakia has 1 so that would mean they have 4 when they win
 
Z

zero

Dang, ANOTHER questionable overside call?? Although I believe the ref was right now...
 
Oh man, the last minutes of the match seem scripted by Hollywood or something, controversially annulled goals and everything.
 
Z

zero

maybe...

but Italy has to score again, they have only 2 points and Slovakia has 1 so that would mean they have 4 when they win
D'oh! You're right, of course...

---------- Post added at 03:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:45 PM ----------

GG Italy
 
B

Biardo

yeah they don't have time to do anything back I fear

---------- Post added at 05:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 PM ----------

ow man 2 min for 1 goal
 
Z

zero

Italy robbed on a legit goal, should have been tied! Changes everything.
Which one? After watching a replay, I'd say the overside was a good call (although a close one).

The other one? I've seen multiple replay angles, slo-mo, and really, I can't tell...
 
Holy shit, 3-2... I'm telling you, not even a scripted game would be this intense. The entire country of Italy must have made grooves on their chairs with their fingernails.
 
Z

zero

Holy shit, 3-2... I'm telling you, not even a scripted game would be this intense. The entire country of Italy must have made grooves on their chairs with their fingernails.
And Slovakia, who, let's face it, deserves it more!
 
That was dramatic. Italy didn't deserve to move on. The last 20 minutes was great entertainment.

But how often will good goals be denied due to human incompetence? I think with today's day and age with the available technology they should allow teams to contest disallowed goals. That no-goal will be the talk of the tournie, or at the very least, the talk of some countries for the next 4 years.
 
Z

zero

... and Pepe MISSES IT!

It's over... Slovakia 3 x 2 Italy one of the most intense games I've seen in my life...

So we have Paraguay 1st and Slovakia 2nd. CONMEBOL is dominating...
 
B

Biardo

and there goes the reigning world champion, together with France that is the second finalist from last time.

And I don't see it those two denied goals, maybe the offside one but even in the replay I'm not sure so videos wouldn't help in this case.
 
B

Biardo

now I see it again it's offside I would say so good call by the assistant
 
Z

zero

The other one? I've seen multiple replay angles, slo-mo, and really, I can't tell...
Instant replay shows him clearly onside.[/QUOTE] LOL, really? I would say instant replays clearly show him offside! Well.. if it was a bad call, I can't blame the ref for it...
 
He was offside by like an elbow.. so fucking close... but yeah, offside.

The other one I'm not so sure about, though.
 
B

Biardo

if you look between the legs you can see the ball and that it's still above the line, maybe because of the angle that isn't really proof but I still think that it was a good call too
 
I remember during this years winter olympics people were saying how the US didn't stand a chance in Hockey.
 
B

Biardo

yes but in hockey there are like 6 good countries so a surprise is easier if the others don't bring their A game

if in football you have the top 6 countries that aren't preforming to their usual standards there are still 10 countries who will so it's a lot more difficult, I think you all hope to much on a miracle. Not that I don't want to see the USA do good but it is to soon, you can just get to the top without a solid background IMO.
 
That was a good call, but the offsides rule is crap. The ref can just judge if a player is cherry picking and penalize him. No reason plays like that should be illegal.
 
That was a good call, but the offsides rule is crap. The ref can just judge if a player is cherry picking and penalize him. No reason plays like that should be illegal.
What? I'm sorry, but that's just a stupid statement. If there was no offside rule the entire game would be long, long passes trying to bypass the defense.
 
B

Biardo

yep it's there for a reason, now they could make sure it's easier to enforce with technical improvements but they shouldn't get rid of it.
 
That was a good call, but the offsides rule is crap. The ref can just judge if a player is cherry picking and penalize him. No reason plays like that should be illegal.
What? I'm sorry, but that's just a stupid statement. If there was no offside rule the entire game would be long, long passes trying to bypass the defense.[/QUOTE]
Like I said, the refs can determine whether or not a player is cherry picking and then penalize him. The fact that that goal was illegal means theres a flaw in the rules.
 
Z

zero

Like I said, the refs can determine whether or not a player is cherry picking and then penalize him. The fact that that goal was illegal means theres a flaw in the rules.
Wait, you want to add MORE ref adjudication to the offside rule? Seriously, if the current offside rule has anything wrong, it's precisely how it leaves too much open to interpretation.

Sure, that was a nice goal, but you need to draw a line somewhere, and it's for the better that the line is clearly drawn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top