What an ugly logo.Hey, here's my senator, Ben Sasse, giving a HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION SPEECH.
What an ugly logo.Hey, here's my senator, Ben Sasse, giving a HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION SPEECH.
Or because they are following the examples of their elected officials.Good news, everyone! It seems that the overall number of people who trust scientists and find them credible is increasing!
View attachment 34001
...but that's only because they are gaining trust among Democrats. Republicans remain steadfastly, unwaveringly skeptical.
At this point I want a study launched to find out if the cause of that Republican skepticism is a simple fear of technocracy (and commensurate loss of political power), or maybe because Republicans are projecting their own feelings of uncertainty/disbelief onto scientists. And, in the name of Science, I will leave open the possibility that there may be some other reason(s), but my expectation is that it will come down to one of those two.
--Patrick
Or because they are just DEEP IN DENIAL.Or because they are following the examples of their elected officials.
I thought Sweden had the highest per capita now.Or because they are just DEEP IN DENIAL.
View attachment 34002
I mean, it's an actual fact that the US has more cases than any other country. Even if you go by a per-capita measurement, the only one higher is Spain, and the US is closing Spain's per-capita lead and is even expected to surpass it before we're done. But the R/lR's reaction? "Lies and Fake news!"
--Patrick
Apologies if the methodology/actual wording of the question was posted somewhere, but not seeing that, I can say that I am not sure how I personally would answer the question "I believe that the US has a greater/lesser/equal share of coronavirus infections." If the question were "The US has a >/</= share of REPORTED coronavirus cases" then I'd answer based on the reporting data, but honestly, that would be sort of a dumb question because it's really trying to get at whether the average respondent believes that the US is either being "targeted" (by evil foreign powers or 5G or aliens or whatever) or "protected" (by "our superior medical technology"...). If, however, the question were as ambiguously worded as the graphic implies, then I'd expect the answer to be reflective of the respondent's local environment (big city vs rural area), local case reporting, and their knowledge of how poor the testing ability is in the US and other countries. That is to say, hypothetical country X with multiple densely populated cities but virtually absent testing ability likely commands a similar share of actual cases/deaths attributable to COVID-19 when compared to the US, though their numbers will be vastly lower due to underreporting.I mean, it's an actual fact that the US has more cases than any other country. Even if you go by a per-capita measurement, the only one higher is Spain, and the US is closing Spain's per-capita lead and is even expected to surpass it before we're done. But the R/lR's reaction? "Lies and Fake news!"
This doesn't surprise me. What were the other questions in the poll? "Great deal" implies 5/5 implicit trust.Good news, everyone! It seems that the overall number of people who trust scientists and find them credible is increasing!
View attachment 34001
...but that's only because they are gaining trust among Democrats. Republicans remain steadfastly, unwaveringly skeptical.
At this point I want a study launched to find out if the cause of that Republican skepticism is a simple fear of technocracy (and commensurate loss of political power), or maybe because Republicans are projecting their own feelings of uncertainty/disbelief onto scientists. And, in the name of Science, I will leave open the possibility that there may be some other reason(s), but my expectation is that it will come down to one of those two.
--Patrick
I saw that.In the "No, really?" department:
Nearly half of the Twitter accounts discussing 'reopening America' may be bots, researchers say
I'm busy. Someone else care to double-check who owns those stations? I promise to be shocked, shocked at the result."Maaaaaww?! They're doing it again!"
...Did you know their shareholder meeting is today (Wednesday)? I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
--Patrick
Ah. I wasn't sure how many stations Bezos controlled under the Washington Post umbrella.Multiple companies, this time it's lazy producers just running with the dreck Amazon sent them. There's a lot of news folk out there calling it out. This isn't even paid propaganda, just lazy ass work by those stations.
YouTube's response: "The deletion of comments critical of the Chinese government was due to 'an error,'" a YouTube spokesperson [said]. "This appears to be an error in our enforcement systems and we are investigating. Users can report suspected issues to troubleshoot errors and help us make product improvements."YouTube is deleting comments with two phrases that insult China’s Communist Party
The two anti-communist phrases you can’t say on YouTube.www.theverge.com
Translation: We got caught.YouTube's response: "The deletion of comments critical of the Chinese government was due to 'an error,'" a YouTube spokesperson [said]. "This appears to be an error in our enforcement systems and we are investigating. Users can report suspected issues to troubleshoot errors and help us make product improvements."
--Patrick
<melodramatic confusion> "However did THAT get added to the filter database?"We got caught.
Well that was a trip down crazy I wish I hadn't ever learned about.
But wait, I thought this was fine because El Cheeto assured us "what a really good guy" Putin is and Russia is totally out for our best interests. /sHow I know what they are talking about on Fox News:
My mom texted me all shocked and outraged at how much we pay Russia to launch astronauts into space. When I pointed out that it's actually 1/4 the price that launching a shuttle was, she went on a total fucking rant about how the Dems/Obama privatized the space program and stole all the money from it because they are greedy. There is not enough WTF in the world.
oh God that was still just this week wasn’t itMan, that racist central park woman caught a lucky break.