I've been listening to an adventure game podcast co-hosted by PunishinUpRoses. I'm loving the peak nostalgia.
But they brought up an interesting point. When there are competing brands, like Marvel vs. DC, Nintendo vs. Sega, or Sony vs. Microsoft, there's often tribalism where one side HATES the other and vigorously defends their side. I never cared that tribalism, though I did have a preference (DC, Nintendo, Sony, respectively).
But Rose's pointed out that there wasn't much tribalism among adventure gamers when it came to Sierra vs. LucasArts games. We had a preference, but we didn't hate on the other brand. And I think she's right on that.
But it reminded me of a friend who once said M*A*S*H fans preferred either the movie over the show or vice versa depending on which they saw first. And I wonder if that applies to Sierra or LucasArts, too.
For example, as much as I adore LucasArts games, I will always prefer Sierra games. And I realized my first impression of adventure games was King's Quest 1. My babysitter showed it to me on their computer. They actually narrated the text to me in an exciting manner, so I was hooked.
I didn't play a LucasArts game until a few years later, with Maniac Mansion on the NES (and it didn't really grab me at the time). Didn't play Monkey Island until middle school. So it's not surprising that I lean more in the direction of Sierra games than LucasArts.