What... the... actual... freaking... fuck?Ultimate Gay Fighter
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ne...rld-s-first-ever-gay-video-game/1100-6416909/
Well, I for one don't see how the LGBT community could possibly feel offended at all with a game like this.
There were no video games in the 50's, so at least there were no racist video games.What... the... actual... freaking... fuck?
I think the real trick would be to do something other than just "make it to the exit". If they can come up with other objectives, and figure out different ways to limit manipulation of objects (red border objects explode when dropped too hard, maybe), then this could have a lot of potential.I don't know. It's very cool, but it would be quite hard to make puzzles that are still a challenge, or you'd have to use pretty "barren" levels, or restrict what can be interacted with. Yes, some sort of Portal-like "test chamber" setting might work - but it'd also make it less cool.
Either the puzzles are fairly trivial, or they're fiendishly difficult games of hide-and-go-seek (in a size changing level, should you grow to 50x original size and go looking over the walls, or shrink to 1/50th and find the exit on the bottom of a chess pieve in the corner? How do you tell?). The second could be great fun, but will be more-than-likely completely ruined by the Interwebs.
That said, a game making good use of these mechanics could be great and the next Portal. (as a trend/game type, not as "Portal 3: the Portalling").
Cautiously optimistic.
Not that it makes this any less horrid, but the game was created by a gay man. I have mixed feelings about it.Ultimate Gay Fighter
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/ne...rld-s-first-ever-gay-video-game/1100-6416909/
Well, I for one don't see how the LGBT community could possibly feel offended at all with a game like this.
They bumped it a day. -_-Club Nintendo rewards update is tomorrow. Will it be trash or treasure? (Or both?)
... I'm betting the former. There were too many good ones near the end of 2013 for them to keep going.
Thanks. I was trying to find a video for two games but couldn't. That was one of them.Don't forget this little number:
I'm really really considering getting this for the sole reason that houses can't be broken into. It gives me a reason to try even if I get slaughtered constantly.Rust has become EVE to me. The game I don't want to play, but fucking love hearing people talk about or reading their writing about it.
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2014/01/13/rust-the-importance-of-being-naked-and-afraid
The Shawn he refers to is definitely Shawn Elliott, formerly of GFW magazine and the best gaming podcast of all time and now currently a dude works for Irrational Games.
Sold.The reviews for that game make it really intriguing.
"I love this game, I built a house around a guys house and made him my prisoner, I fed him cans of tuna and cooked chicken when it was available, and some times I would drop in spare logs of wood(when they were available). The best part. he talks to me, keeps telling me his clans going to raid my structure and save him.. I simply respond with .” It puts the lotion on its skin, or it gets the hose again” and by hose I mean I dump charcoal on him." -Manikin50
"A lot of naked men throwing rocks and trying to survive against zombies, animals and other naked men. " - Starscre4m
"Killed a deer got chicken meat out of it, BEST GAME EVER. 20/10 " -(Dis)Obey the Lawson
I like the suggestion that somebody launch a game called "Edge of the Candy Space Marine Scrolls."So, apparently King, makers of Candy Crush, now have a trademark on the word candy in relation to video games and clothing in the USA. The trademark system is completely fucked.
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/01/21/stealing-candy-from-babies-king-embrace-the-aristocracy/
They won't be able to successfully defend it. The term Candy is simply to generic and widespread, so the moment that someone with money decides to fight back King will lose the case and the trademark. It'll be overturned and their trademark will be stripped.So, apparently King, makers of Candy Crush, now have a trademark on the word candy in relation to video games and clothing in the USA. The trademark system is completely fucked.
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/01/21/stealing-candy-from-babies-king-embrace-the-aristocracy/
The game everyone with a cell phone plays.They won't be able to successfully defend it. The term Candy is simply to generic and widespread, so the moment that someone with money decides to fight back King will lose the case and the trademark. It'll be overturned and their trademark will be stripped.
Also, what the fuck is Candy Crush Saga?
Candy crush's mobile platform app. It's only "Candy Crush" without the saga if you're playing the short version on their website. If you have the app with multiple levels, jellies, "lives," social media etc, you have Candy Crush Saga.They won't be able to successfully defend it. The term Candy is simply to generic and widespread, so the moment that someone with money decides to fight back King will lose the case and the trademark. It'll be overturned and their trademark will be stripped.
Also, what the fuck is Candy Crush Saga?
Pure, uncut evil.They won't be able to successfully defend it. The term Candy is simply to generic and widespread, so the moment that someone with money decides to fight back King will lose the case and the trademark. It'll be overturned and their trademark will be stripped.
Also, what the fuck is Candy Crush Saga?
953 games with Candy in the title.but the reality is that few such games ever existed